Oxytocin and Affect Processing in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Affective Functioning: A Test of the Potentially Normalizing Effects of Oxytocin
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators will use multiple methods (including Oxytocin intranasal inhalation, neuroimaging, behavioral measures, peripheral hormone measurements) to examine how individuals' behavior, cognition, and brain function is impacted by the neuro-hormone Oxytocin. Specifically, the investigators plan to evaluate the influence of Oxytocin administration on affective processing in non-trauma exposed and trauma-exposed adults (both with and without posttraumatic stress disorder, PTSD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Aug 2015
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 8, 2020
CompletedApril 8, 2020
March 1, 2020
1 year
June 15, 2015
January 28, 2019
March 16, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
fMRI Analysis: Change in Anterior Insula Region
Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
fMRI Analysis: Change in Accumbens Region
Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
fMRI Analysis: Change in Amygdala Region
Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
fMRI Analysis: Change in dACC Region
Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
fMRI Analysis: Change in mOFC Region
Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
fMRI Analysis: Change in rACC Region
Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
fMRI Analysis: Change in vmPFC Region
Change in blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) contrast signal in regions of interest relevant to fear/threat (e.g., decrease in amygdala activation) and reward processing (increase in ventral striatum activation) in oxytocin versus placebo sessions. Forearm brush stroking targets C-tactile (CT) nerves, which respond to gentle touch and engage the insula and cortical brain regions that mediate social-emotional processing. Palm brush stroking is the control condition, in that CT afferents do not innervate the palm. We contrasted BOLD responses to gentle continuous brushing of the arm vs. palm (4 blocks of 8 trials each), expecting greater oxytocin-related increases in brain reactivity within the insula and other regions in the forearm condition versus the palm condition. The values are % signal change from baseline.
1 week; fMRI data collected at second and third visits, one week apart
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Salivary Oxytocin
Within session (30 min) and between sessions (1 week); saliva samples collected twice (before and after OT administration) at both second and third visits, one week apart
Study Arms (3)
Healthy adult controls (18-55)
EXPERIMENTALDrug: oxytocin and placebo nasal spray (within-subjects design, blinded and counterbalanced for two lab sessions); dosage=24 international units (IU). Participant inserts nasal spray container 1cm into nostril at angle of 45 degrees and sprays. Will wait 15 seconds then repeat administration to other nostril (alternating between nostrils). Participants will receive 6 puffs in total (3 in each nostril).
Adults with PTSD (18-55)
EXPERIMENTALDrug: oxytocin and placebo nasal spray (within-subjects design, blinded and counterbalanced for two lab sessions); dosage=24 international units (IU). Participant inserts nasal spray container 1cm into nostril at angle of 45 degrees and sprays. Will wait 15 seconds then repeat administration to other nostril (alternating between nostrils). Participants will receive 6 puffs in total (3 in each nostril).
Trauma-exposed/no-PTSD adults (18-55)
EXPERIMENTALDrug: oxytocin and placebo nasal spray (within-subjects design, blinded and counterbalanced for two lab sessions); dosage=24 international units (IU). Participant inserts nasal spray container 1cm into nostril at angle of 45 degrees and sprays. Will wait 15 seconds then repeat administration to other nostril (alternating between nostrils). Participants will receive 6 puffs in total (3 in each nostril).
Interventions
See arm/group descriptions for dosage amount and procedure.
See arm/group descriptions for dosage amount and procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults: age 18-55
- Be in good medical health
- Be cooperative with testing
- English is a language spoken in the family
- PTSD as diagnosed by a certified clinician or the research team for PTSD group.
You may not qualify if:
- Moderate or severe acute or chronic medical illnesses (e.g.cardiac disease, diabetes, epilepsy, influenza).
- History of hypertension with baseline blood pressure above 160 mm Hg (systolic) over 100 mm Hg (diastolic).
- history of syncope and/or baseline blood pressure below 100 mm Hg (systolic).
- weight \>300lb
- The use of some psychotropic medications will not be allowed. Females taking contraceptive hormones will not be able to participate in the study.
- Currently breast feeding or pregnant
- For MRI ONLY: Any metal or electromagnetic implants
- For MRI ONLY: Significant hearing loss or other severe sensory impairment
- A fragile health status.
- For MRI ONLY: A history of seizures or current use of anticonvulsants
- Healthy adult controls (HC):
- Be free of both neurological and psychiatric disorders (current and past) on the basis of self-report
- Be free of psychiatric disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
- National Center for PTSDcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Lauren Sippel
- Organization
- National Center for PTSD
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Linda Mayes, MD
Yale University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2015
First Posted
September 11, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 8, 2020
Results First Posted
April 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03