Remote Magnetic Navigation-guided Ablation Versus Cryoablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RECREATION Study)
RECREATION
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Compare the safety and efficacy of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation and cryoablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedSeptember 6, 2019
September 1, 2019
4.2 years
January 30, 2017
September 5, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Clinical efficacy (time to first AF recurrence after blanking period)
the time to first AF recurrence after blanking period (month)
one year
Clinical safety (Any procedure-related complications)
Any procedure-related complications
one year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Procedure time (min)
one week
Time to first cardiovascular hospitalization (month)
one year
QoL of 12 months (Units on a Scale)
one year
X-ray time (min)
one week
Study Arms (2)
Remote magnetic navigation
EXPERIMENTALPersistent atrial fibrillation ablation with remote magnetic navigation
Cryoablation
ACTIVE COMPARATORPersistent atrial fibrillation ablation with cryoballoon
Interventions
Pulmonary vein isolation and other areas ablation guided by remote magnetic navigation
Pulmonary vein isolation and other areas ablation used by cryoballoon
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Persistent atrial fibrillation (\>7d, \< 5years)
- Age 18-75 years
- Patient is mentally and linguistically able to understand the aim of the trial and to show sufficient compliance in following the trial protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Any previous left atrial ablation or surgery
- Any cardiac surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention within 3 months prior to enrollment
- Stroke or transient ischemic attack within 6 months prior to enrollment
- Myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to enrollment
- Anteroposterior left atrial diameter \> 55 mm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ruijin Hospitallead
Related Publications (4)
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, Albenque JP, Tondo C; FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2235-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
PMID: 27042964RESULTKuck KH, Furnkranz A, Chun KR, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Schluter M, Elvan A, Lim HW, Kueffer FJ, Arentz T, Albenque JP, Tondo C, Kuhne M, Sticherling C, Brugada J; FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2858-2865. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw285. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PMID: 27381589RESULTKuniss M, Greiss H, Pajitnev D, Akkaya E, Deubner N, Hain A, Bodammer L, Berkowitsch A, Chierchia GB, Hamm CW, Neumann T. Cryoballoon ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: feasibility and safety of left atrial roof ablation with generation of conduction block in addition to antral pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2017 Jul 1;19(7):1109-1115. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw146.
PMID: 27738068RESULTJin QI, Pehrson S, Jacobsen PK, Chen XU. Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27 Suppl 1:S23-8. doi: 10.1111/jce.12929.
PMID: 26969219RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Qi Jin, MD
Ruijin Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2017
First Posted
February 7, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
September 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share