NCT03041571

Brief Summary

A qualitative study assessing the impact of early narrative medicine practice on Medical Honors Program (MHP) students' attitudes regarding patient-centered interactions, through interviewing patients with chronic or life-limiting illnesses to obtain their illness stories. MHP students will develop a patient narrative for the patients interviewed. These narratives will be edited by the patient, and, with the permission of the patients, may be published as a collection of stories.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 2, 2017

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2017

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 18, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 18, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

January 31, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 2, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient provider orientation scale score (PPOS)

    The PPOS is an 18 item questionnaire developed to evaluate patient centered care. The items are rated on a 6 point Likert-type scale. It has two separate parts, sharing and caring, that can be either summed or divided for scoring purposes. Higher scores indicate more patient centeredness.

    baseline

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Patient provider orientation scale- "Sharing" portion

    baseline

  • Patient provider orientation scale- "Caring" portion

    baseline

  • Patient and Student post-interview discussion

    immediately post-interview, up to 1 day

  • Medical honors students focus group

    following completion of all MHP/Patient interviews, up to 4 months

Study Arms (2)

Medical Honors Students

The Medical Honors Program students will fill out the Patient Provider Orientation Scale (PPOS). MHP students will then interview a patient with a chronic or life limiting illness.

Behavioral: Patient Provider Orientation ScaleBehavioral: Interview performed by MHP student

Patients with chronic illnesses

The patients will fill out the PPOS scale. The patient will then have an Interview performed by MHP student

Behavioral: Patient Provider Orientation ScaleBehavioral: Interview performed by MHP student

Interventions

Investigators are interested in the impact that our activity has on the students' patient-centeredness. Investigators will use the Patient-Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS), which will be completed by both the student and the patient prior to the encounter. Following the interview, the co-investigators will lead a discussion with the patient and student. Investigators will discuss differences in patient and student PPOS scores, and how each party felt the interview went. Investigators will examine if the patients feel the interview differed from typical interactions with health care providers, and how this made the patient feel. The students will describe what was learned from the patients story as well as try to explore reasons why providers may not always learn the patient's illness story.

Medical Honors StudentsPatients with chronic illnesses

The MHP students took a course called Medical Humanities in the fall of 2016. MHP students learned patient interviewing skills and the importance of gathering the patients "illness story". The students will conduct an interview with a patient with chronic illness, which will be focused on gather information about how the patients illness affects daily life as well as interactions with the health care system.

Medical Honors StudentsPatients with chronic illnesses

Eligibility Criteria

Age8 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Study population is two-fold. First the MHP students will be recruited and consented. Their participation is voluntary and will not affect their grades. Second, patients will be recruited based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient of Shands UF Health or Shands Children's hospital
  • Children must be at least 8 years old
  • Patients diagnosed with chronic or potentially life-limiting illnesses
  • Patients must be English speaking
  • UF students enrolled in the Medical Honors Program
  • Medical Honors students must be up to date on HIPAA training and Confidentiality statement agreement
  • Students must take the Medical Humanities course
  • UF college of medicine students

You may not qualify if:

  • Anyone that the medical social worker or Child life specialist feels would be unwilling or unable to participate in the study
  • Patients who at the time of interview are unfit to communicate (ex. Ventilated, comatose)
  • Patients less than eight years old
  • Patients that do not speak English
  • Students not enrolled in the UF College of Medicine
  • Students not enrolled in the Medical Humanities course

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, 32611, United States

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1171-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3.

    PMID: 23807099BACKGROUND
  • Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, Veloski J, Gonnella JS. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009 Sep;84(9):1182-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55.

    PMID: 19707055BACKGROUND
  • Griffith CH 3rd, Wilson JF. The loss of student idealism in the 3rd-year clinical clerkships. Eval Health Prof. 2001 Mar;24(1):61-71. doi: 10.1177/01632780122034795.

    PMID: 11233586BACKGROUND
  • Haidet P, Dains JE, Paterniti DA, Chang T, Tseng E, Rogers JC. Medical students' attitudes toward patient-centered care and standardized patients' perceptions of humanism: a link between attitudes and outcomes. Acad Med. 2001 Oct;76(10 Suppl):S42-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200110001-00015. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11597869BACKGROUND
  • Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222274/

    PMID: 25057539BACKGROUND
  • Kim SS, Kaplowitz S, Johnston MV. The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Health Prof. 2004 Sep;27(3):237-51. doi: 10.1177/0163278704267037.

    PMID: 15312283BACKGROUND
  • Stacy R, Spencer J. Patients as teachers: a qualitative study of patients' views on their role in a community-based undergraduate project. Med Educ. 1999 Sep;33(9):688-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00454.x.

    PMID: 10476021BACKGROUND
  • Krupat E, Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Thom D, Azari R. When physicians and patients think alike: patient-centered beliefs and their impact on satisfaction and trust. J Fam Pract. 2001 Dec;50(12):1057-62.

  • Krupat E, Pelletier S, Alexander EK, Hirsh D, Ogur B, Schwartzstein R. Can changes in the principal clinical year prevent the erosion of students' patient-centered beliefs? Acad Med. 2009 May;84(5):582-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819fa92d.

  • Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jan;39(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00090-7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Narrative MedicineChronic DiseaseNeoplasmsDiabetes MellitusCystic FibrosisCollagen DiseasesHematologic Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NarrationCommunicationBehaviorDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesInfant, Newborn, DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Robert Lawrence, MD

    University of Florida

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2017

First Posted

February 2, 2017

Study Start

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion

October 18, 2019

Study Completion

October 18, 2019

Last Updated

January 6, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations