Study Stopped
Medtronic shift in strategic direction for study device
Surveillance Monitoring as an Alternative to Telemetry
A Prospective Evaluation of Surveillance Monitoring as an Alternative to Telemetry in Patients Scheduled for Telemetry Without American Heart Association (AHA) Indication
1 other identifier
interventional
206
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of surveillance monitoring versus telemetry monitoring on clinical, healthcare economics, resource utilization, and qualitative outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 4, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 4, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 29, 2019
CompletedMay 13, 2019
April 1, 2019
9 months
January 30, 2017
December 7, 2018
April 29, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hospital Length of Stay (LOS) as Assessed by Review of Medical Records
LOS will be determined by comparing LOS Between the Surveillance Monitoring and Telemetry Monitoring Period Arms.
Baseline to end of hospital stay (or up to 30 day post enrollment)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Associated Health Care Costs (HCC) as Determined by Review of Billing Records
Baseline to end of hospital stay (or up to 30 days post enrollment)
Number of Participants With Hospital Unit Transfers (HUT) as Determined by Review of Medical Records
Baseline to end of hospital stay (or up to 30 days post enrollment)
Length of Stay (LOS) in the ICU as Determined by Review of Medical Records
Baseline to end of hospital stay (or up to 30 days post enrollment)
Number of Participants With Clinical Interventions (CI) as Determined by Review of Medical Records
Baseline to end of hospital stay (or up to 30 days post enrollment)
Time of Rapid Response Team Activation to Time of a Threshold Notification as Measured by the Surveillance Monitoring System Only
Baseline to end of hospital stay (or up to 30 days post enrollment)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Telemetry Monitoring Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe telemetry group will serve as the control group and will be monitored via the site's standard of care telemetry protocols.
Surveillance Monitoring Arm
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in the surveillance monitoring group will alternatively be admitted to medical surgical unit and be monitored via the surveillance monitoring platform.
Interventions
The Vital Sync™ Informatics Manager (IM) \& Virtual Patient Monitoring Platform (VPMP) is an electronic medical record connectivity and remote continuous patient monitoring software solution.
Continuous ECG monitoring for hospitalized patients at-risk for cardiac events.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and dated informed consent by subject
- Male or female 18 years of age or older
- Expected hospitalized admission on the general care floor or medical surgical unit for at least one overnight stay and/or \> 12 hours
- Scheduled for telemetry monitoring
- Diagnosis indicates American Heart Association (AHA) telemetry Class III or none and therefore not indicated for telemetry monitoring
- For surveillance monitoring group subjects, treating provider who scheduled subject for telemetry agrees to alternative monitoring plan of surveillance monitoring
- Willingness to have study devices attached and hair shaved at sensor location as needed during study participation
- Willingness to participate in all aspects of the study
You may not qualify if:
- Implanted pacemaker or atrial defibrillator
- Allergy or sensitivity to ECG leads or adhesives that are similar to ECG leads
- Current AHA Class I or II indication/prescription for telemetry monitoring
- Prescription for other continuous condition monitoring such as capnography or pulse oximetry
- Ongoing opioid therapy by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), by epidural or intrathecal infusions or by intravenous analgesia, per Investigator discretion
- Ventilated or intubated patients at the time of enrollment
- Female subject is pregnant, lactating, trying to get pregnant, or has a positive pregnancy test for women with childbearing potential
- Condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may prevent completion of the study or protocol requirements
- Subject is considered as being morbidly obese (defined as BMI \>50.0)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic - MITGlead
Study Sites (1)
Washington University in Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63130, United States
Limitations and Caveats
This study was terminated early, no conclusions should be drawn from the data.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anne Kinney
- Organization
- Medtronic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stacey House, MD, PhD
Washington University in Saint Louis
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2017
First Posted
February 1, 2017
Study Start
April 3, 2017
Primary Completion
January 4, 2018
Study Completion
January 4, 2018
Last Updated
May 13, 2019
Results First Posted
April 29, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share