On-Demand Oxygen Delivery System Study
Comparison of an On-Demand Oxygen Delivery System to Continuous Flow Supplemental Oxygen in the Operating/Procedure Room
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main goal of this study is to determine if supplemental oxygen given only when the patient is inspiring (demand delivery) is more effective than constant-flow oxygen given during all phases of the breath regardless if the patient is breathing it in. A previous study in volunteers (NCT02886312) showed that the oxygen saturation in the blood and the concentration of oxygen breathed out from the lungs (end-tidal oxygen) was higher when given in demand (inhalation only) mode. A secondary goal is to determine in patients, whether turning oxygen delivery off during expiration improves the accuracy of end-tidal CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) monitoring. This was found to be the case in the previous volunteer study. The investigators want to determine if these improvements are also observable in relatively healthy patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia. The efficacy of the demand mode will be determined by measuring the resulting difference in oxygen saturation and end-tidal oxygen levels. The investigators will alternate between traditional oxygen delivery (continuous flow) and demand delivery (flow only during inhalation) for two minutes in each mode after which oxygen saturation and end-tidal oxygen will be measured. End-tidal CO2 measurement will be compared with those during the brief time when O2 flow is stopped.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 11, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
April 30, 2026
April 1, 2026
10 years
November 7, 2016
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
End-tidal Oxygen
Did the novel system increase end-tidal oxygen?
measured every 140 seconds minutes throughout the surgical procedure
Oxygen Saturation
Did the novel system increase oxygen saturation?
measured continuously with every heart beat (i.e., approx. every 500-2000msec) throughout the surgical procedure
End-tidal Carbon Dioxide
Was end-tidal carbon dioxide measured more accurately using the novel system?
measured every 140 seconds minutes throughout the surgical procedure
Study Arms (1)
Only Arm
EXPERIMENTALTwo minutes: Intervention: Device: On Demand Oxygen Delivery 20 sec or 3 breaths, whatever comes first: Intervention: Device: Oxygen Flow Stopped Two minutes intervention: Device: Traditional, Always-On, Oxygen Delivery 20 sec or 3 breaths, whatever comes first: Intervention: Device: Oxygen Flow Stopped Repeat until the end of the surgical procedure
Interventions
Supplemental oxygen flow is controlled such that it is on only during inhalation.
Supplemental oxygen flow is constantly on, irrespective of whether the patient is inhaling or exhaling.
Supplemental oxygen flow is stopped completely for a brief period to allow undisturbed end-tidal oxygen and CO2 measurements
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA class I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Procedures scheduled for a lime less than 20 minutes
- Age \< 18 years
- Baseline SpO2 (arterial oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry) \< 93% on room air
- ARDS (Acute respiratory distress syndrome), lung disease, cardiovascular disease
- ASA class IV or above
- Pregnant women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
Related Publications (3)
Bliss PL, McCoy RW, Adams AB. Characteristics of demand oxygen delivery systems: maximum output and setting recommendations. Respir Care. 2004 Feb;49(2):160-5.
PMID: 14744265BACKGROUNDFuhrman C, Chouaid C, Herigault R, Housset B, Adnot S. Comparison of four demand oxygen delivery systems at rest and during exercise for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2004 Oct;98(10):938-44. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.010.
PMID: 15481269BACKGROUNDGodbold S, Lowe G, Willis R. Healthcare Professionals Accuracy and Consistency in Setting Oxygen Flowmeters for Patients in an Intensive Care Unit. Respir. Care 59(10):OF26, December 2014.
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kai Kuck, Ph.D.
University of Utah Department of Anesthesiology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 7, 2016
First Posted
November 11, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 30, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to share individual participant data.