Barbed vs Standard Suture for Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff Closure
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy is a procedure that is performed each time more often. One of the problems described for this procedure has to do with the closure of the vaginal vault, increased surgical time when suture laparoscopically, complications such as dehiscence of the dome, infections, hematomas and dyspareunia. A prospective study will be conducted to compare two different techniques for closure of the vaginal vault.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 24, 2017
February 1, 2017
1 month
January 19, 2017
February 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cuff closure time
time spend for vaginal Cuff closure (in minutes)
20 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intra or postoperative complications
10 days
Dyspareunia
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
2/0 barbed suture
EXPERIMENTALUse barbed suture for the closure of the vaginal vault in patients with total Laparoscopic hysterectomy caused by a benign gynecologist pathology
Vicryl suture
ACTIVE COMPARATORUse VICRYL suture for the closure of the vaginal vault in patients with total Laparoscopic hysterectomy caused by a benign gynecologist pathology
Interventions
Close vaginal vault 2 planes with 2/0 barbed suture in patients with total laparoscopic hysterectomy in benign pathology
Close vaginal vault 2 planes with 0/0 Vicryl suture in patients with total laparoscopic hysterectomy in benign pathology
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients scheduled for total laparoscopic hysterectomy without other simultaneous procedures , for benign causes , who were agree to participate in the trial and give their written consent.
- Patients ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) 1 and 2
- Patients who are able to communicate by telephone and answer questions
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with coagulation disorders, chronic use of corticosteroids, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), collagen diseases, diabetes.
- Endometriosis III / IV
- Patients who can not be reached by phone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CES Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Claudia Lopez
MedellĂn, Antioquia, Colombia
Related Publications (21)
Cohen SL, Einarsson JI. Total and supracervical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;38(4):651-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.09.002.
PMID: 22134014RESULTHur HC, Donnellan N, Mansuria S, Barber RE, Guido R, Lee T. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;118(4):794-801. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f1c92.
PMID: 21934442RESULTCeccaroni M, Berretta R, Malzoni M, Scioscia M, Roviglione G, Spagnolo E, Rolla M, Farina A, Malzoni C, De Iaco P, Minelli L, Bovicelli L. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after hysterectomy: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Oct;158(2):308-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.013. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PMID: 21723030RESULTEinarsson JI, Vellinga TT, Twijnstra AR, Chavan NR, Suzuki Y, Greenberg JA. Bidirectional barbed suture: an evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes. JSLS. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):381-5. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466007566.
PMID: 21333192RESULTHwang JH, Lee JK, Lee NW, Lee KW. Vaginal cuff closure: a comparison between the vaginal route and laparoscopic suture in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(3):163-9. doi: 10.1159/000316052. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
PMID: 21160140RESULTJeung IC, Baek JM, Park EK, Lee HN, Kim CJ, Park TC, Lee YS. A prospective comparison of vaginal stump suturing techniques during total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Dec;282(6):631-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1300-0. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
PMID: 19943055RESULTSiedhoff MT, Yunker AC, Steege JF. Decreased incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence after laparoscopic closure with bidirectional barbed suture. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):218-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.002.
PMID: 21354068RESULTUccella S, Ghezzi F, Mariani A, Cromi A, Bogani G, Serati M, Bolis P. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;205(2):119.e1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.024. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
PMID: 21620360RESULTRamirez PT, Klemer DP. Vaginal evisceration after hysterectomy: a literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002 Jul;57(7):462-7. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200207000-00023.
PMID: 12172223RESULTIaco PD, Ceccaroni M, Alboni C, Roset B, Sansovini M, D'Alessandro L, Pignotti E, Aloysio DD. Transvaginal evisceration after hysterectomy: is vaginal cuff closure associated with a reduced risk? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Mar 1;125(1):134-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.08.009. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
PMID: 16154253RESULTCroak AJ, Gebhart JB, Klingele CJ, Schroeder G, Lee RA, Podratz KC. Characteristics of patients with vaginal rupture and evisceration. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):572-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000115507.26155.45.
PMID: 14990423RESULTJacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1041-1048. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b9d222.
PMID: 20168105RESULTCronin B, Sung VW, Matteson KA. Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):284-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.08.026. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
PMID: 21974989RESULTUccella S, Ceccaroni M, Cromi A, Malzoni M, Berretta R, De Iaco P, Roviglione G, Bogani G, Minelli L, Ghezzi F. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in a series of 12,398 hysterectomies: effect of different types of colpotomy and vaginal closure. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):516-23. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318264f848.
PMID: 22914459RESULTChan WS, Kong KK, Nikam YA, Merkur H. Vaginal vault dehiscence after laparoscopic hysterectomy over a nine-year period at Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit - our experiences and current understanding of vaginal vault dehiscence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;52(2):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01411.x. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
PMID: 22335453RESULTBlikkendaal MD, Twijnstra AR, Pacquee SC, Rhemrev JP, Smeets MJ, de Kroon CD, Jansen FW. Vaginal cuff dehiscence in laparoscopic hysterectomy: influence of various suturing methods of the vaginal vault. Gynecol Surg. 2012 Nov;9(4):393-400. doi: 10.1007/s10397-012-0745-5. Epub 2012 May 3.
PMID: 23144640RESULTACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72.
PMID: 20168127RESULTHur HC, Guido RS, Mansuria SM, Hacker MR, Sanfilippo JS, Lee TT. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.11.005.
PMID: 17478361RESULTKho RM, Akl MN, Cornella JL, Magtibay PM, Wechter ME, Magrina JF. Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):231-235. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181af36e3.
PMID: 19622982RESULTVilla MT, White LE, Alam M, Yoo SS, Walton RL. Barbed sutures: a review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Mar;121(3):102e-108e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000299452.24743.65.
PMID: 18317092RESULTGreenberg JA. The use of barbed sutures in obstetrics and gynecology. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Summer;3(3):82-91.
PMID: 21364859RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
CLAUDIA LOPEZ, Gynecologist
CLINICA DEL PRADO
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Gynecologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2017
First Posted
February 1, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
February 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share