Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Versus Surgical Staples for Closure of Pfannenstiel Skin Incisions
Pfannenstiel Incision Closure: Subcuticular Suture Versus Surgical Staples
1 other identifier
interventional
288
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares methods of closure for Pfannenstiel incisions commonly used during gynecological and obstetrical surgery. Patients are assigned to closure by either surgical staples or a buried suture. Information is collected on the day of surgery, post-operative day two and at the six-week follow up visit. The amount of pain and cosmetic result are compared. Infection rates will also be monitored for the two groups. The study hypothesis is as follows: subcuticular (buried) sutures as compared to surgical staples lead to decreased post-operative pain and improved cosmetic result. Infection rates are similar for both groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2005
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2007
CompletedAugust 11, 2011
August 1, 2011
September 12, 2005
August 10, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Cosmesis
Infection rates
Length of stay OR time
Overall patient satisfaction
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergoing gynecological or obstetrical surgery
- Pfannenstiel skin incision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Joseph's Healthcare
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cara A Donnery, MD
McMaster University Obstetrics and Gynecology Resident
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Persadie, MD
Staff Doctor: St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2005
First Posted
September 16, 2005
Study Start
July 1, 2005
Study Completion
June 1, 2007
Last Updated
August 11, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-08