Clinical Trial of Zirconia and Metal Adhesive Bridges
A Single-centre Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial of Zirconia-based Versus Metal-based Adhesive Bridges for Replacing 2 Missing Teeth or Less in Adults.
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adhesive bridges are becoming popular in patients with congenitally missing teeth and these are type of bridges that can be done with only minimal or with no preparation to replace the missing tooth/teeth. The best clinical gain is the minimal tooth preparation or no need for the removal of tooth substance. Treatment for this type of bridges does not usually require anaesthesia. In addition, adhesive bridges can provide reasonable aesthetical outcome with minimal cost and reduced chair time. The biggest issue is that high failure rate in the long term, and gray colour shining through the metal wing cemented onto the abutment tooth. This can compromise the aesthetical outcome. The aesthetical problem can be solved by the use of zirconia all ceramic material to construct the bridge.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2018
CompletedSeptember 26, 2022
January 1, 2011
6 years
April 27, 2011
September 23, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical survival of adhesive bridges
Evaluation of clinical survival: participants will be evaluated according to the modified USPHS criteria. The evaluation criteria will include: retention, framework fracture, veneering fracture, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and colour match. The examination will be after one to two weeks, after 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. The evaluation will also include the biological complication. Plaque, gingival index, periodontal probing depth and gingival recession will be evaluated around the abutments and compared to a control tooth
5 Years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Quality of life, aesthetic outcome.
18 months
Marginal discrepancy evaluation.
After cementation
Economic evaluation
5 years
Study Arms (2)
Zirconia-based adhesive bridges
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will be treated with the employment of zirconia-based adhesive bridges to replace the missing tooth/teeth.
Metal-based adhesive bridges
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will be treated with the employment of metal-based adhesive bridges.
Interventions
Zirconia-based adhesive bridge will be used to replace the missing tooth/teeth.
The metal-based adhesive bridge will be used to replace the missing tooth/teeth.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female ≥ 18 years of age
- Has a maximum of 2 units requiring placement
- Is a regular dental attendee and agree to return for assessments
- Written subject informed consent (IC) for this protocol will be obtained prior to study enrolment. Each subject will be required to sign and date the IC form prior to their participation
- Sound or minimally restored abutment(s)
You may not qualify if:
- The presence of any periodontal pocket depths equal or above 4 mm with active periodontal disease
- Any history of adverse reaction to clinical materials to be used in this study
- They are pregnant or had serious medical condition that may interfere with the dental treatment
- Acquired tooth loss more than 2 units requiring replacement
- Participants who have parafunctional habits
- Severe Class II Div II cases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Barts and The London, School of Medicine and Dentistry
London, E1 2AD, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aylin Baysan, BDS, MSc, PhD
Queen Mary University of London
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Amani Agha, BDS,MSc
Queen Mary University of London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2011
First Posted
May 4, 2011
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2018
Study Completion
April 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2011-01