Neostigmine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvants to Lidocaine During Intravenous Local Anesthesia
Efficacy of Neostigmine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvants to Lidocaine During Intravenous Local Anesthesia for Forearm Orthopedic Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) is described firstly in 1908 by August Bier. It is simple, safe, reliable, less cost, efficient method in forearm surgery. The advantage of this method has fast return of motor and sensory function which enables patients for earlier discharge. However, this method has disadvantages such as tourniquet pain, insufficient muscle relaxation and postoperative analgesia. Lidocaine inhibits action potential propagation within neuronal tissue by binding to receptors in Na+ channels located on the nerve cell membrane. Lidocaine IVRA is safe and effective and is associated with a rapid onset (4.5 minutes) of anesthesia after injection and termination of analgesia (5.8 ± 0.5 minutes) once the tourniquet is deflated. Neostigmine is a typical cholinesterase inhibitor. It increases the level of acetylcholine (Ach) and indirectly stimulates both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors. In anesthesia, neostigmine is a drug that has been used for reversal of residual neuromuscular block. Administration of neostigmine by intrathecal and epidural routes has been found to cause analgesia by inhibition of the breakdown of Ach in the spinal cord. Dexamethasone is commonly used in anesthesia to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Two recent meta-analyses have documented that dexamethasone also reduced postoperative pain and opioid requirement. Intravenous dexamethasone has also been shown to improve postoperative pain control in patients receiving spinal or epidural morphine. Hong et al reported that intravenous dexamethasone in combination with a caudal block with ropivacaine prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia without adverse effects in children undergoing orchidopexy. So the investigators expect that addition of dexamethasone or neostigmine will affect duration and postoperative analgesia in bier block.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jan 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2018
CompletedJanuary 23, 2019
January 1, 2019
1.7 years
January 10, 2017
January 21, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain assessed on VAS
perfalgan will be given when visual analogue score ≥ 4
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sensory level
2 hours
Motor level
2 hours
Number of patients with any complications
24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Group N
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 patients will receive intravenous 3mg/kg lidocaine 2 % (diluted with normal saline to 40 ml) + 0.5 mg neostigmine for Bier block.
Group D
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30 patients will receive intravenous 3mg/kg lidocaine 2 % (diluted with normal saline to 40 ml) + 8 mg dexamethasone for Bier block.
Interventions
Patients will receive intravenous 3mg/kg lidocaine 2 % (diluted with normal saline to 40 ml) + 0.5 mg neostigmine for Bier block.
Patients will receive intravenous 3mg/kg lidocaine 2 % (diluted with normal saline to 40 ml) + 8 mg dexamethasone for Bier block.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age from 20 - 60 years.
- ASA grade I - II.
- Surgical time does not exceed 90 minutes.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal.
- Any contraindication of regional anesthesia block (e.g. Coagulopathy, infection at the needle insertion site or vascular insufficiency).
- A personal history of seizures, peripheral neurologic diseases, cardiac arrhythmias, sickle cell anemia, liver dis¬ease, renal dysfunction and cardiac conduction abnormalities.
- Patients with allergy to amide local anesthetics or medication included in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut university hospital
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
HAMDY A. YOUSSEF, MD
Assiut University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2017
First Posted
January 16, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2018
Study Completion
September 30, 2018
Last Updated
January 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01