Analgesic Efficacy of Quadaratus Lumborum Block (QLB) for Laparoscopic Colectomy Surgery: A Prospective Case Control Trial to Evaluate Clinical Outcomes
1 other identifier
observational
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain after abdominal surgery can be extensive. Pain control is an important component of patient comfort and participation in rehabilitation. Multimodal analgesia methods have shown to reduce postoperative pain, and have been addressed to be a crucial part of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a posterior abdominal wall block which analgesic efficacy has been shown for abdominal surgeries, and also for different laparoscopic procedures, such as ovarian surgery. The aim of this study is to assess QLB's analgesic efficacy for laparoscopic colectomy surgeries, using serial pain score assessments and overall opioid consumption; its effect on patient satisfaction; and its effect on the development of postoperative respiratory complications. This study is a prospective clinical trial assessing the effect of application of QLB as a regional analgesic technique for primary laparoscopic colectomy, in comparison to a historical retrospective cohort.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 14, 2018
CompletedMay 15, 2018
January 1, 2017
11 months
January 10, 2017
May 9, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) elicited during the patient's post operative recovery unit (PACU)
24 Hours
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) on postoperative day 1
24 hours
Verbal analogue scale (VAS)
patient's maximal reported pain scores using a numeric verbal analogue scale (1-10) on postoperative day 2
48 hours
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Total opioid consumption in PACU
24 hours
Total opioid consumption on postoperative day 1.
24 hours
Total opioid consumption postoperative day 2
48 hours
Total opioid consumption at four weeks postoperatively
4 weeks
Length of hospital stay
1 week
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patients receiving QLB and questionaires
Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic colectomy patients under general anesthesia with an additional Quadratus lumborum block (QLB ) will be asked to fill out a questionnaires detailing: numeric verbal analogue scores (VAS) and quality of recovery score(QoR) preoperatively, 24 hours and 48 hours and four weeks after surgery. Additional data will be collected: ASA physical status, demographics, intra- and post operative opiate(expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg) and non opiate consumption in order to assess the analgesic efficacy of QLB for primary laparoscopic colectomy. QLB will be performed as per standard routine regimens, in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery.
Historical control
The control subjects' data will be assessed reviewing patient records. Data will include: * Maximal PACU VAS pain score (per nursing charts) * Overall POD 24 hours and 48 hours and 4 weeks opioid consumption (overall morphine mg/kg equivalent dose) * POD 24 and 48 hours and 4 weeks Respiratory complications
Interventions
Patients undergoing primary laparoscopic colectomy patients under general anesthesia with an additional Quadratus lumborum block (QLB ) will be asked to fill out a questionnaires detailing: numeric verbal analogue scores (VAS) and quality of recovery score(QoR) preoperatively, 24 hours, 48 hour and four weeks after surgery. Additional data will be collected: ASA physical status, demographics, intra- and post operative opiate(expressed as morphine equivalent in mg/kg) and non opiate consumption in order to assess the analgesic efficacy of QLB for primary laparoscopic colectomy. QLB will be performed as per standard routine regimens, in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population will include adults older than 18 years who are American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) Classes 1-3. Inclusion criteria are patients undergoing primary laparoscop colectomy under general anesthesia with QLB.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Allergy to local anesthetics or to systemic opioids
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia technique, such as local infection or coagulopathy, or patients receiving anticoagulation therapy with smaller specifications than listed in professional guidelines.
- Contraindication to the Quadratus lumborum block such as defects or interferences in the abdominal wall obstructing anatomical structure visibility.
- Requirements of more than 30 mg morphine equivalent daily prior to surgery
- ASA IV or greater
- Psychiatric or cognitive disorders
- Incarceration
- Renal insufficiency with Cr \> 2.0
- Hepatic failure
- Pregnancy
- Age under 18 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rabin Medical Center
Petach Tikvah, Israel
Related Publications (10)
Fischer HB, Simanski CJ, Sharp C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H; PROSPECT Working Group. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1105-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
PMID: 18627367RESULTJenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
PMID: 22221014RESULTO'Donnell BD, Iohom G. Regional anesthesia techniques for ambulatory orthopedic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;21(6):723-8. doi: 10.1097/aco.0b013e328314b665.
PMID: 19009687RESULTKang H, Ha YC, Kim JY, Woo YC, Lee JS, Jang EC. Effectiveness of multimodal pain management after bipolar hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Feb 20;95(4):291-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01708.
PMID: 23302898RESULTKazak Bengisun Z, Aysu Salviz E, Darcin K, Suer H, Ates Y. Intraarticular levobupivacaine or bupivacaine administration decreases pain scores and provides a better recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Anesth. 2010 Oct;24(5):694-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0970-x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
PMID: 20571832RESULTEssving P, Axelsson K, Aberg E, Spannar H, Gupta A, Lundin A. Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):926-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288deb. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
PMID: 21821506RESULTMyles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.
PMID: 9895071RESULTMyles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.
PMID: 10740540RESULTInsall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4.
PMID: 2805470RESULTMelvin JS, Stryker LS, Sierra RJ. Tranexamic Acid in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;23(12):732-40. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00223. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
PMID: 26493971RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shia Fein, MD
Rabin Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2017
First Posted
January 11, 2017
Study Start
February 27, 2017
Primary Completion
January 14, 2018
Study Completion
January 14, 2018
Last Updated
May 15, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-01