Teen Success Project
JPO-CM
Improving Access to Substance Abuse Evidence-Based Practices for Youth in the Justice System: Strategies Used by JPOs
1 other identifier
interventional
310
1 country
14
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of Juvenile Probation Officers (JPOs) delivering Contingency Management (CM) to teens on their caseload who have problems with drug use. CM has already been shown to be effective at helping teens with drug problems but CM has never been delivered by JPOs. This study will test how well it works to have JPOs deliver CM during their regular meetings with teens.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2023
CompletedOctober 21, 2025
May 1, 2024
5 years
January 6, 2017
October 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes from Baseline scores compared to 9 months post-Baseline Urine Drug Screens (measured at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months).
The number of positive drug screens from toxicology testing for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), synthetic THC, amphetamines, methamphetamines, opiates, phencyclidine (PCP), cocaine, benzodiazepines and alcohol metabolites (Ethyl glucuronide, Ethyl sulfate ).
Baseline to 9 months
Changes from Baseline scores compared to 9 months post-Baseline Substance Use and Problems (measured at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months).
Frequency of substance use and substance-related problems self-reported on the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs.
Baseline to 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Changes in number and severity of criminal charges in official records in the 18 months pre-Baseline compared with 18 months post-Baseline.
18 months pre-Baseline to 18 months post-Baseline.
Changes from Baseline scores compared to 9 months post-Baseline Delinquent Behaviors (measured at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months).
Baseline to 9 months.
Changes from Baseline scores compared to 9 months post-Baseline Sexual Risk Behaviors (measured at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months).
Baseline to 9 months.
Changes from Baseline scores compared to 9 months post-BaselineTreatment Usage (measured at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months).
Baseline to 9 months.
Changes from Baseline scores compared to 9 months post-Baseline Internalizing and Externalizing Behaviors (measured at 0, 3, 6 and 9 months).
Baseline to 9 months.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Contingency Management
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive regular probation services but will also receive the Contingency Management program for substance abuse from their juvenile probation officer during regular meetings.
Probation as Usual
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive regular services that are usually provided by juvenile probation officers.
Interventions
Contingency Management (CM) utilizes behavior modification \& cognitive behavioral strategies to target adolescent alcohol or other drug (AOD) use. Protocol components are as follows: (a) The provider introduces CM to the family and engages them in the intervention; (b) The provider conducts Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (ABC) assessments of the youth's AOD use with the youth and caregiver; (c) Based on the results of the ABC assessments, self-management planning and drug refusal skills training are implemented by the provider in collaboration with the caregiver; (d) Concurrently, a point and level system contract is filled in by the family, which provides rewards/privileges for negative drug and alcohol tests and disincentives (e.g., extra chores) for positive tests. Until continued abstinence is achieved, components "b" through "d" are repeated; (e) The provider collaborates with the family to develop plans for sustaining long-term abstinence. Typical duration of CM is 12-16 weeks.
Standard services that a young person would receive while under probation supervision in the state.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Employed as a juvenile probation officer within one of the participating counties
- Serving clients aged 12-18 years old with a substance abuse problem
You may not qualify if:
- Not employed as a juvenile probation officer within one of the participating counties
- Not serving clients aged 12-18 years old with a substance abuse problem
- Juvenile probation officers solely assigned to a specialized caseload (e.g., sexual offense or gang unit) were excluded if they were the only one in their county with that assignment because randomization would be precluded
- Newly opened probation case (can have previous cases)
- years old
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-5 (DSM-5) substance use disorder
- Pervasive intellectual or developmental disorder
- Active psychotic disorder
- Youth actively involved in a Drug Court Program at time of study recruitment
- Ages Eligible for Study
- Youth: 12 Years to 18 Years
- JPOs: Any age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chestnut Health Systemslead
- George Mason Universitycollaborator
- Oregon Social Learning Centercollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Cassia County Juvenile Probation
Burley, Idaho, 83318, United States
Canyon County Juvenile Probation
Caldwell, Idaho, 83605, United States
Gooding County Juvenile Probation
Gooding, Idaho, 83330, United States
Blaine County Juvenile Probation
Hailey, Idaho, 83333, United States
Jerome County Juvenile Probation
Jerome, Idaho, 83338, United States
Minidoka Juvenile Probation
Rupert, Idaho, 83350, United States
Lincoln County Juvenile Probation
Shoshone, Idaho, 83352, United States
Twin Falls County Juvenile Probation
Twin Falls, Idaho, 83301, United States
Carson City Juvenile Probation
Carson City, Nevada, 89701, United States
Washoe County Juvenile Probation
Reno, Nevada, 89512, United States
Deschutes County Juvenile Probation
Bend, Oregon, 97701, United States
Umatilla County Juvenile Probation
Pendleton, Oregon, 97801, United States
Marion County Juvenile Probation
Salem, Oregon, 97301, United States
Wasco County Juvenile Probation
The Dalles, Oregon, 97058, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 6, 2017
First Posted
January 10, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 14, 2022
Study Completion
June 5, 2023
Last Updated
October 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share