NCT03013153

Brief Summary

Laparoscopy colon surgery is accepted worldwide in the recent years. But there is still argument on the effect of laparoscopy rectal surgery. Laparoscopy has advantages on showing the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA), protection of autonomic nerve, low rectal anastomosis, and total mesorectum excision. However, debate on the level of IMA ligation and debonding of splenic flexure never ends. This study is going to give a clear and definite answer to how and why surgeons should deal with the IMA in laparoscopy rectal surgery,base on the 3D reconstruction of IMA and identification of IMA perfusion types.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
748

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 31, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 6, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2018

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

January 12, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

December 31, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 11, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Rectal CancerInferior Mesenteric ArteryLigationApical Lymph NodesLaparoscopyIMA Types

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • 5-years overall survival rate

    5-years overall survival rate

    5 years

Secondary Outcomes (23)

  • 5-years disease free survival rate

    5 years

  • 1-year overall survival rate

    1 year

  • 1-year disease free survival rate

    1 year

  • Anastomosis leakage rate

    6 months

  • Apical Lymph Nodes (LN) Positive Rate

    1 week

  • +18 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection

EXPERIMENTAL

Left colic artery (LCA) is identified according to the CT 3D-reconstruction, tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, preserved LCA while low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed. Lymphadenectomy to the apical lymph nodes (No.253)is performed around the IMA until 2 cm from the aorta. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.

Procedure: Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection

High ligation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Open the peritoneum proceeds cephalad towards the duodenojejunal angle of Treitz, and the mesenteric root is incised 1 cm below the inferior margin of the pancreas. The aortomesenteric window is opened wide and the inferior mesenteric vessels are exposed. The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.

Procedure: High ligation

Interventions

Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection (LAND). Left colic artery (LCA) is identified according to the CT 3D-reconstruction, tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, preserved LCA while low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery is performed. Lymphadenectomy to the apical lymph nodes (No.253)is performed around the IMA until 2 cm from the aorta.

Also known as: LAND
Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection
High ligationPROCEDURE

High ligation (HL) Open the peritoneum proceeds cephalad towards the duodenojejunal angle of Treitz, and the mesenteric root is incised 1 cm below the inferior margin of the pancreas. The aortomesenteric window is opened wide and the inferior mesenteric vessels are exposed. The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the pancreatic margin.

Also known as: HL
High ligation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pathology shows rectal or sigmoid adenocarcinoma
  • The bottom edge of tumor to anuas is less than 15cm
  • The clinical staging of tumor by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) within T2-4 or N1-2
  • Receive or not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil before surgery
  • Racial resection in available after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • No metastasis evidence was found
  • Annual preservation surgery is available
  • Tolerate to general anesthesia
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status score between 0 and 1
  • Patients and general anesthesia can understand the clinical trail well and are willing to take part in

You may not qualify if:

  • Suffer with other carcinoma synchronous or metachronous in 5 years
  • Multiple primary colon carcinoma
  • Radiation therapy was performed before surgery
  • History of colorectal surgery
  • Combine with acute intestinal obstruction, intestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation and emergency surgery is needed
  • Multiple organs resection surgery is needed
  • Abdominal perineal resection is performed
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists score stage IV to V
  • Pregnant, suckling period or reject to contraception
  • Severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrollable infection or other severe complication
  • Severe mental illness
  • Unable to go through the treatment because of family, society or regional condition
  • Refuse to take part in the trail

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The sixth affiliated hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510655, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (23)

  • Mari G, Maggioni D, Costanzi A, Miranda A, Rigamonti L, Crippa J, Magistro C, Di Lernia S, Forgione A, Carnevali P, Nichelatti M, Carzaniga P, Valenti F, Rovagnati M, Berselli M, Cocozza E, Livraghi L, Origi M, Scandroglio I, Roscio F, De Luca A, Ferrari G, Pugliese R. "High or low Inferior Mesenteric Artery ligation in Laparoscopic low Anterior Resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial" (HIGHLOW trial). Trials. 2015 Jan 27;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0537-5.

    PMID: 25623323BACKGROUND
  • Bostrom P, Haapamaki MM, Matthiessen P, Ljung R, Rutegard J, Rutegard M. High arterial ligation and risk of anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients with increased cardiovascular risk. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;17(11):1018-27. doi: 10.1111/codi.12971.

    PMID: 25851151BACKGROUND
  • Tanaka J, Nishikawa T, Tanaka T, Kiyomatsu T, Hata K, Kawai K, Kazama S, Nozawa H, Yamaguchi H, Ishihara S, Sunami E, Kitayama J, Watanabe T. Analysis of anastomotic leakage after rectal surgery: A case-control study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2015 May 11;4(2):183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.05.002. eCollection 2015 Jun.

    PMID: 26042185BACKGROUND
  • Dauser B, Herbst F. Diagnosis, management and outcome of early anastomotic leakage following colorectal anastomosis using a compression device: is it different? Colorectal Dis. 2014 Dec;16(12):O435-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12742.

    PMID: 25132419BACKGROUND
  • GRIFFITHS JD. Surgical anatomy of the blood supply of the distal colon. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1956 Oct;19(4):241-56. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13363265BACKGROUND
  • Masoni L, Mari FS, Nigri G, Favi F, Gasparrini M, Dall'Oglio A, Pindozzi F, Pancaldi A, Brescia A. Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2420-3. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

    PMID: 22733197BACKGROUND
  • Hida J, Okuno K. High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery. Surg Today. 2013 Jan;43(1):8-19. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0359-6. Epub 2012 Oct 7.

    PMID: 23052748BACKGROUND
  • Murono K, Kawai K, Kazama S, Ishihara S, Yamaguchi H, Sunami E, Kitayama J, Watanabe T. Anatomy of the inferior mesenteric artery evaluated using 3-dimensional CT angiography. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):214-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000285.

    PMID: 25585080BACKGROUND
  • Seike K, Koda K, Saito N, Oda K, Kosugi C, Shimizu K, Miyazaki M. Laser Doppler assessment of the influence of division at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic blood flow in rectosigmoid cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jun;22(6):689-97. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0221-7. Epub 2006 Nov 3.

    PMID: 17082922BACKGROUND
  • Battal B, Hamcan S, Akgun V, Bozkurt Y. Congenital superior-inferior mesenteric arterial variation or arc of Riolan due to occlusion of proximal superior mesenteric artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Apr;36(3):309-10. doi: 10.1007/s00276-013-1212-3. Epub 2013 Oct 18. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24135762BACKGROUND
  • van Gulik TM, Schoots I. Anastomosis of Riolan revisited: the meandering mesenteric artery. Arch Surg. 2005 Dec;140(12):1225-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.12.1225.

    PMID: 16365247BACKGROUND
  • Bertrand MM, Delmond L, Mazars R, Ripoche J, Macri F, Prudhomme M. Is low tie ligation truly reproducible in colorectal cancer surgery? Anatomical study of the inferior mesenteric artery division branches. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Dec;36(10):1057-62. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1281-y. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

    PMID: 24633578BACKGROUND
  • Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Michelassi F, Charlson ME, Milsom JW. Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):108-13. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262a6cd.

    PMID: 22968068BACKGROUND
  • Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA, Jayne DG. Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Feb;16(2):95-109. doi: 10.1111/codi.12411.

    PMID: 23992097BACKGROUND
  • Silberhumer GR, Paty PB, Temple LK, Araujo RL, Denton B, Gonen M, Nash GM, Allen PJ, DeMatteo RP, Guillem J, Weiser MR, D'Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR, Wong DW, Fong Y. Simultaneous resection for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis is a safe procedure. Am J Surg. 2015 Jun;209(6):935-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.024. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

    PMID: 25601556BACKGROUND
  • Hadidi AT. A technique to improve vascularity in colon replacement of the esophagus. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Feb;16(1):39-44. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-923925.

    PMID: 16544225BACKGROUND
  • Raboei EH, Luoma R. Colon patch esophagoplasty: an alternative to total esophagus replacement? Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Aug;18(4):230-2. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038396. Epub 2008 Jul 15.

    PMID: 18629764BACKGROUND
  • Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Desiderio J, Vettoretto N, Parisi A, Boselli C, Noya G. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed. Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep;21(3):e111-23. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

    PMID: 22770982BACKGROUND
  • Gervaz P, Platon A, Buchs NC, Rocher T, Perneger T, Poletti PA. CT scan-based modelling of anastomotic leak risk after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(10):1295-300. doi: 10.1111/codi.12305.

    PMID: 23710555BACKGROUND
  • Doeksen A, Tanis PJ, Wust AF, Vrouenraets BC, van Lanschot JJ, van Tets WF. Radiological evaluation of colorectal anastomoses. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Sep;23(9):863-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0487-z. Epub 2008 Jun 17.

    PMID: 18560844BACKGROUND
  • Hu X, Cheng Y. A Clinical Parameters-Based Model Predicts Anastomotic Leakage After a Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision: A Large Study With Data From China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(26):e1003. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001003.

    PMID: 26131798BACKGROUND
  • Qu H, Liu Y, Bi DS. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3608-17. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4117-x. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

    PMID: 25743996BACKGROUND
  • Majbar MA, Elmalki Hadj O, Souadka A, El Alaoui M, Sabbah F, Raiss M, Hrora A, Ahallat M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Tunis Med. 2014 Jul;92(7):493-6.

    PMID: 25775290BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Meijin Huang, MD

    The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Jiaming Zhou, MD

CONTACT

Meijin Huang, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2016

First Posted

January 6, 2017

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2018

Study Completion

December 1, 2023

Last Updated

January 12, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations