Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Using a 22 vs 25-Gauge Needle
Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Using a 22 vs 25-Gauge Needle; A Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
61
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical research study is to compare the effectiveness of a smaller, 25-gauge needle when used in an endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) instead of a standard 22-gauge needle. The safety of the needles will also be studied.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 25, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 22, 2022
CompletedJune 22, 2022
May 1, 2022
3.5 years
December 19, 2016
June 22, 2021
May 25, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Lymph Nodes With Adequate Samples
The primary outcome was the proportion of concordance between the 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in sample adequacy after two passes. The intervention group each of the lymph nodes sampled first with 25 gauge-needle, then the 22 gauge-needle. The Control Group each of the 200 lymph nodes were sampled first with the 22 gauge- needles, then the 25 gauge-needle. Sample adequacy was assessed after 2 passes using each needle in all participants and recorded.
One to two hours.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Concordance With the Final Diagnosis
One to two hours
Usability of the Needle
1-2 hours (Intra procedurally)
Study Arms (2)
EBUS-TBNA:First Using a 25-Gauge Needle Then 22-gauge Needle
EXPERIMENTALEndobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) performed by first using a 25-gauge needle, followed by a 22-gauge needle.
EBUS-TBNA:First Using a 22-Gauge Needle Then 25-gauge Needle
EXPERIMENTALEndobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) performed by first using a 22-gauge needle, followed by a 25-gauge needle.
Interventions
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) performed by using a 25-gauge needle.
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) performed by using a 25-gauge needle.
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) performed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Indication for EBUS-guided needle biopsy based on suspicion of either benign or malignant disease in mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating
- Inability to give informed consent
- Patients in which only one lymph node station is expected to be sampled by the performing clinician.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centerlead
- Boston Scientific Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- George Eapen,MD/ Professor, Pulmonary Medicine
- Organization
- UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George A. Eapen, MD
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2016
First Posted
December 29, 2016
Study Start
December 16, 2016
Primary Completion
June 25, 2020
Study Completion
June 25, 2020
Last Updated
June 22, 2022
Results First Posted
June 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05