NCT02996617

Brief Summary

Neutropenia is one of the most frequent adverse effects of chemotherapy, and the main factor to limit the dosage and the continuation of chemotherapy. The PEG-rhG-CSF has increased plasma half-life, and prolonged efficacy in compare with rhG-CSF. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of PEG-rhG-CSF in preventing neutropenia following chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
240

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 19, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 19, 2016

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

November 19, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Lymphomas Non-Hodgkin's B-CellLymphomas Non-Hodgkin's T-CellPEG-rhG-CSFNeutropenia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia(neutrophils≤1×10^ 9/L) in every cycle

    Proportion of patients grade 3/4 neutropenia(neutrophils≤1×10\^ 9/L)

    through the study completion,an average of 4 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Rate of the chemotherapy delay

    through the study completion,an average of 4 months

  • Rate of the febrile neutropenia in every cycle

    through the study completion,an average of 4 months

Study Arms (2)

rhG-CSF regimen

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients weren't preventive use of rhG-CSF(ruibai 100ug).If their WBC≤1×10\^ 9/L,they were administered rhG-CSF:5ug/kg/day until their WBC≥4×10\^ 9/L for total 4 courses.

Drug: rhG-CSF regimen

Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients were administered pegylated rhG-CSF 6mg(weight≥45Kg)or 3mg(weight≤45Kg)once 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy drugs of every chemotherapy cycle for total 4 courses.

Drug: Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen

Interventions

Patients weren't preventive use of rhG-CSF.If their WBC≤1×10\^ 9/L,they were administered rhG-CSF:5ug/kg/day until their WBC≥4×10\^ 9/L.Chemotherapy regimen: CHOP: Epirubicin:70 mg/m2 , Cyclophosphamide:750 mg/m2, Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2 , Prednison:100mg/d; CHOPE: Epirubicin:70 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide:750 mg/m2,Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2,Prednison:100mg/d,Etoposide: 100 mg/(m2•d);EPOCH:etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin;Hyper-CVAD(A):hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine,doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate;GemOx-R:Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin;GDP:gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin

Also known as: Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen
rhG-CSF regimen

Patients were administered pegylated rhG-CSF 6mg(weight≥45Kg)or 3mg(weight≤45Kg)once 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy drugs of every chemotherapy cycle.Chemotherapy regimen: CHOP: Epirubicin:70 mg/m2 , Cyclophosphamide:750 mg/m2, Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2 , Prednison:100mg/d; CHOPE: Epirubicin:70 mg/m2, Cyclophosphamide:750 mg/m2,Vincristine: 1.4 mg/m2,Prednison:100mg/d,Etoposide: 100 mg/(m2•d);EPOCH:etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin;Hyper-CVAD(A):hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine,doxorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine and methotrexate;GemOx-R:Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin;GDP:gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin

Pegylated rhG-CSF regimen

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Investigator diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma(Highly invasive lymphoma/Burkitt lymphoma were excluded)
  • Age 18 to 80 years
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2
  • receive multi-cycle Chemotherapy naive
  • grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in the patient's first cycle chemotherapy or the risk of neutropenia \>20% without rhG-CSF support
  • Expected survival time≥3 months; cNormal bone marrow function(absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 × 109/L; platelet count ≥ 80 × 109/L)
  • Liver function: transaminase≤2.5× upper limit of normal value,bilirubin≤2.5×upper limit of normal value; serum creatinine≤2×upper limit of normal value;

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with severe complications or severe infection;
  • Invasion of central nervous system;
  • Patients with severe visceral organ dysfunction, heart block, myocardial infarction within 6 months;
  • Prior bone marrow stem cell or organ transplantation
  • patients with severe allergic constitution, or those who are allergic to Escherichia coli products; 5. Patients participate in other clinical studies within 4 weeks;
  • Pregnancy, lactation
  • Other patients who are not suitable for the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Hematology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University

Jin'an, Shandong, 250012, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Green MD, Koelbl H, Baselga J, Galid A, Guillem V, Gascon P, Siena S, Lalisang RI, Samonigg H, Clemens MR, Zani V, Liang BC, Renwick J, Piccart MJ; International Pegfilgrastim 749 Study Group. A randomized double-blind multicenter phase III study of fixed-dose single-administration pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2003 Jan;14(1):29-35. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg019.

    PMID: 12488289BACKGROUND
  • Holmes FA, Jones SE, O'Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, George T, Savin M, Richards D, Glaspy J, Meza L, Cohen G, Dhami M, Budman DR, Hackett J, Brassard M, Yang BB, Liang BC. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002 Jun;13(6):903-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130.

    PMID: 12123336BACKGROUND
  • Johnston E, Crawford J, Blackwell S, Bjurstrom T, Lockbaum P, Roskos L, Yang BB, Gardner S, Miller-Messana MA, Shoemaker D, Garst J, Schwab G. Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2522-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.13.2522.

    PMID: 10893282BACKGROUND
  • Hadji P, Kostev K, Schroder-Bernhardi D, Ziller V. Cost comparison of outpatient treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in Germany. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Apr;50(4):281-9. doi: 10.5414/cp201633.

    PMID: 22456299BACKGROUND
  • Wen TJ, Wen YW, Chien CR, Chiang SC, Hsu WW, Shen LJ, Hsiao FY. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among breast cancer and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients under Taiwan's national health insurance system. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):288-293. doi: 10.1111/jep.12597. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

    PMID: 27491287BACKGROUND
  • Shi YK, Chen Q, Zhu YZ, He XH, Wang HQ, Jiang ZF, Chang JH, Liu YP, Wang AL, Luo DY, Zhang Y, Ke XY, Li WL, Zhang WJ, Wang XW, Zhang YP, Wang JM, Liu XQ. Pegylated filgrastim is comparable with filgrastim as support for commonly used chemotherapy regimens: a multicenter, randomized, crossover phase 3 study. Anticancer Drugs. 2013 Jul;24(6):641-7. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e3283610b5d.

    PMID: 23571496BACKGROUND
  • Molineux G. Pegylation: engineering improved pharmaceuticals for enhanced therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2002 Apr;28 Suppl A:13-6. doi: 10.1016/s0305-7372(02)80004-4.

    PMID: 12173407BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, Non-HodgkinLymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, T-CellNeutropenia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

LymphomaNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System DiseasesAgranulocytosisLeukopeniaCytopeniaHematologic DiseasesLeukocyte Disorders

Study Officials

  • xin wang, MD, PHD

    Shandong Provincial Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

xin wang, MD, PHD

CONTACT

changqing zhen, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of Department of Hematology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2016

First Posted

December 19, 2016

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

November 1, 2018

Study Completion

December 1, 2018

Last Updated

December 19, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations