High Volume Foleys Increasing Vaginal Birth Pilot Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
130
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
It is currently unknown if there is a way to decrease the risk of cesarean delivery when undergoing cervical ripening and induction of labour. Some research suggests a Foley catheter placed through the cervix and filled to 80cc may decrease this risk. We wish to run a large scale trial to see if Foleys filled to 80cc decrease the risk of Cesarean section compared to the commonly used medication for cervical ripening, prostaglandins. Before we can undertake a large trial, we need to do a pilot to see if women will agree to participate in this type of study. As well, a pilot will help with trouble shooting prior to a large trail, to improve the chances of successfully answering this clinically important question.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 5, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedApril 4, 2019
April 1, 2019
3 years
December 5, 2016
April 2, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of eligible women who are approached to participate in the study that are enrolled and randomized to either the use of a high volume Foley or prostaglandin for cervical ripening
The primary outcome measure of percent of women recruited will be captured by the number of women who undergo the randomized intervention divided by the number of women who are approached.
15 months
Study Arms (2)
Prostaglandin
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdministration of the prostaglandin for cervical ripening of the clinician's choice, ie Prostin (Prostin E2 Vaginal Gel 1mg intravaginally) or Cervidil (dinoprostone, 10 mg vaginal insert)
Foley catheter filled to 80cc
EXPERIMENTALInsertion of a Foley catheter through the cervix and filling to 80cc
Interventions
A Foley catheter is inserted through the cervix and filled to 80cc
Insertion of the prostaglandin (Prostin (1mg dinoprostone vaginal gel) or Cervidil (10mg vaginal slow release insert)) of the clinicians choice into the vagina for the purpose of cervical ripening
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nulliparous women 37 weeks and 0 days to 41 weeks and 6 days gestational age (term) requiring cervical ripening
- Health care provider feels it is possible to administer either method of cervical ripening.
- Bishop score of 6 or less
- Live, singleton, cephalic fetus
- Availability of personnel to consent and randomize participants
You may not qualify if:
- Non-viable fetus
- Contraindication to cervical ripening, labour induction or labour
- Prior attempt at induction of labour in this pregnancy
- Spontaneous rupture of fetal membranes
- Evidence of labour or regular uterine contractions
- Lack of consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centrelead
- AFP Innovation Fundcollaborator
Related Publications (8)
Berndl A, El-Chaar D, Murphy K, McDonald S. Does cervical ripening at term using a high volume foley catheter result in a lower caesarean section rate than a low volume foley catheter? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Aug;36(8):678-687. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30509-0.
PMID: 25222162BACKGROUNDLeduc D, Biringer A, Lee L, Dy J; CLINICAL PRACTICE OBSTETRICS COMMITTEE; SPECIAL CONTRIBUTORS. Induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Sep;35(9):840-857. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30842-2. English, French.
PMID: 24099451BACKGROUNDJozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub2.
PMID: 22419277BACKGROUNDLevy R, Kanengiser B, Furman B, Ben Arie A, Brown D, Hagay ZJ. A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1632-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.033.
PMID: 15547534BACKGROUNDKashanian M, Nazemi M, Malakzadegan A. Comparison of 30-mL and 80-mL Foley catheter balloons and oxytocin for preinduction cervical ripening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 May;105(2):174-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Feb 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 19232606BACKGROUNDDelaney S, Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas J, Sparks TN, Paul K, Caughey AB. Labor induction with a Foley balloon inflated to 30 mL compared with 60 mL: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;115(6):1239-1245. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dec6d0.
PMID: 20502296BACKGROUNDJozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Benthem M, van Beek E, Dijksterhuis MG, de Graaf IM, van Huizen ME, Oudijk MA, Papatsonis DN, Perquin DA, Porath M, van der Post JA, Rijnders RJ, Scheepers HC, Spaanderman ME, van Pampus MG, de Leeuw JW, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KW; PROBAAT Study Group. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 Dec 17;378(9809):2095-103. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61484-0. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
PMID: 22030144BACKGROUNDde Vaan MD, Ten Eikelder ML, Jozwiak M, Palmer KR, Davies-Tuck M, Bloemenkamp KW, Mol BWJ, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
PMID: 36996264DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne ML Berndl, MD MSc
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre,University of Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor University of Toronto Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Associate Scientist, Sunnybrook Research Institute
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 5, 2016
First Posted
December 15, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 4, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is not currently an IPD sharing plan