IVES for Treatment of UUI and OAB
EMED Detruset Intravesical Electrical Stimulation Catheter for Treatment of Urge Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder Syndrome in Females
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The pilot study is intended to show the efficacy of intravesical electrical stimulation in treating overactive bladder with or without frequency and/or urgency urinary incontinence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2016
CompletedJanuary 4, 2017
December 1, 2016
11 months
December 12, 2016
December 30, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reduction in incontinence
Primary endpoint is a reduction in incontinence events at 3 months post treatment as determined by a 7 point patient global impression of improvement
3 months
Study Arms (1)
Treatment
OTHERThis pilot study group is a prospective observational study. It is not blinded and there is no control. This is a single arm study (treatment group) which will receive intravesical electrical stimulation with a total of 8 therapy sessions, each lasting 15 minutes. The sessions will be done in a serial fashion, 2 per week for 4 consecutive weeks.
Interventions
There will be a total of 8 therapy sessions, each lasting 15 minutes. The sessions will be done in a serial fashion, 2 per week for 4 consecutive weeks. The electrical parameters utilized will be those previously determined to be appropriate for OAB and UUI. As the beneficial effect of electrical stimulation is dependent on a "maximal" level of stimulation, the stimulation voltage will be increased during the first minute of treatment until the maximum tolerated by the patient is established and then backed-off by 1-2 Volts. The therapy will continue for 15 minutes in total for each session. The VAS will be marked by the patient before each treatment session throughout the therapy period, and other questionnaires will be administered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- years old
- Urinary urge incontinence OR overactive bladder
- Prior trial of medical treatment for UUI or OAB
You may not qualify if:
- pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage 1
- multiple sclerosis
- parkinson's disease
- spinal cord injury
- long-term DM type I
- prior surgeries that may affect innervation of the detrusor nerves or the spinal cord
- pregnancy
- pacemaker/defibrillator
- PVR \>150ml
- dementia
- Stress urinary incontinence
- intravesical botox injection within 1 year, PTNS within 6 months, or medical treatment for OAB within 3 weeks; bulking agent injection within 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Loma Linda University Health
Loma Linda, California, 92354, United States
Related Publications (4)
Hagerty JA, Richards I, Kaplan WE. Intravesical electrotherapy for neurogenic bladder dysfunction: a 22-year experience. J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1680-3; discussion 1683. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.188. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
PMID: 17707024BACKGROUNDCheng EY, Richards I, Balcom A, Steinhardt G, Diamond M, Rich M, Donovan JM, Carr MC, Reinberg Y, Hurt G, Chandra M, Bauer SB, Kaplan WE. Bladder stimulation therapy improves bladder compliance: results from a multi-institutional trial. J Urol. 1996 Aug;156(2 Pt 2):761-4.
PMID: 8683778BACKGROUNDHong CH, Lee HY, Jin MH, Noh JY, Lee BH, Han SW. The effect of intravesical electrical stimulation on bladder function and synaptic neurotransmission in the rat spinal cord after spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(8):1136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08189.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
PMID: 19021629BACKGROUNDLombardi G, Musco S, Celso M, Ierardi A, Nelli F, Del Corso F, Del Popolo G. Intravesical electrostimulation versus sacral neuromodulation for incomplete spinal cord patients suffering from neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jul;51(7):571-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.37. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
PMID: 23628893BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sam Siddighi, MD
Loma Linda University Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Urogynecology/Pelvic Surgery, FPMRS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2016
First Posted
December 14, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 4, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No IPD will be shared