Study Stopped
feasibility issues
Overactive Bladder Education
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common, chronic condition, characterized by urinary "urgency, with or without urge incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia." Treatment adherence is a major barrier to management of OAB and drug continuation is poor. Many factors may play a role in non-adherence to medication management of OAB including drug cost, side effects, and a lack of understanding of the disease and treatment process.Studies show that recall of disease information and treatment is often suboptimal. Literature shows that providing written materials is an efficacious way to aid in recall. Based on known poor adherence to OAB medication treatment and the clear role patient education methods have on patient information recall, the investigators believe that improvement of participant education through use of a OAB care plan will improve participant understanding and treatment adherence. Through this randomized trial, the investigators plan to evaluate whether implementation of a OAB Care Plan improves understanding of disease and treatment options, treatment success, and satisfaction. This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study of OAB counseling in new patients presenting to the Urogynecology offices of Hartford Hospital. All new patients with a diagnosis of OAB will be offered participation. All consenting participants will be randomized 1:1 to one of two groups: 1) Standard Care group or 2) Care Plan group. In the Standard Care group, participants will be counseled as the physician routinely counsels patients about OAB, in the Care Plan group, participants will be counseled a printed "Overactive Bladder Plan of Care" information sheet. At the end of the visit, the participant will complete a Baseline Survey. The Baseline Survey includes basic demographic information, a physician satisfaction survey, and a OAB knowledge survey. The participant will return for follow up as directed by the physician. At the follow up visit, participants in both groups will complete a Followup Survey. The Followup Survey will be completed before the participant sees the physician. The Followup Survey assesses OAB knowledge. Eight months after the baseline visit, each participant's chart will be reviewed for final data collection. If a participant progresses to a treatment method where she is satisfied and would like to remain, this will be documented.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 20, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedDecember 31, 2015
December 1, 2015
5 months
July 20, 2015
December 29, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Understanding of Overactive Bladder questionnaire
Change from baseline knowledge at follow up visit (on average 8 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Subject satisfaction questionnaire
Baseline visit (time 0)
Treatment success chart review
8 months after baseline visit
Study Arms (2)
Standard Care Group
NO INTERVENTIONIn this group, subjects will receive standard counseling regarding Overactive Bladder.
Care Plan Group
EXPERIMENTALIn this group, subjects will receive counseling regarding Overactive Bladder using a printed "Overactive Bladder Plan of Care" information sheet.
Interventions
Use of a printed "Overactive Bladder Plan of Care" information sheet.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of overactive bladder
- able and willing to participate and consent
- age \>17 years, \<90 years
- female sex
You may not qualify if:
- male sex
- patients who do not have a diagnosis of overactive bladder
- age \<18 years, \>89 years
- unable or unwilling to participate
- patients who are already being treated for overactive bladder
- patients who are planning surgical intervention for pelvic organ prolapse prior to treatment of overactive bladder
- patients who are planning surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence prior to treatment of overactive bladder
- pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Hartford Hospital, Urogynecology Division
Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States
Hartford Hospital, Urogynecology Division
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Hartford Hospital, Urogynecology Division
West Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Related Publications (5)
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, Van Kerrebroeck P, Victor A, Wein A; Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003 Jan;61(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 12559262BACKGROUNDD'Souza AO, Smith MJ, Miller LA, Doyle J, Ariely R. Persistence, adherence, and switch rates among extended-release and immediate-release overactive bladder medications in a regional managed care plan. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Apr;14(3):291-301. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.3.291.
PMID: 18439051BACKGROUNDYeaw J, Benner JS, Walt JG, Sian S, Smith DB. Comparing adherence and persistence across 6 chronic medication classes. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Nov-Dec;15(9):728-40. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.9.728.
PMID: 19954264BACKGROUNDPickney CS, Arnason JA. Correlation between patient recall of bone densitometry results and subsequent treatment adherence. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Sep;16(9):1156-60. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1818-8. Epub 2005 Mar 3.
PMID: 15744452BACKGROUNDWatson PW, McKinstry B. A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations. J R Soc Med. 2009 Jun;102(6):235-43. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090013.
PMID: 19531618BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 20, 2015
First Posted
July 22, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 31, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12