A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess Crestal Bone Remodeling of Four Different Implant Designs
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial aimed to assess the effect of the implant neck design (microthreaded vs. non-microthreaded) as well as the type of abutment connection (internal conical vs. external flat-to-flat) on long-term crestal bone remodelling and peri-implant health. Four implants used for a bar-retained maxillary overdenture, were followed over a period of at least 6 years. Twenty-five patients were treated with a bar-retained maxillary overdenture. Four different implants were placed, with respectively: internal connection and microthreads on the implant neck (I MT); internal connection, without microthreads (I NMT); external connection, with microthreads (E MT); and external connection, without microthreads (E NMT). Other design features, s.a. diameter, surface topography, extent of platform switch as well as the surgical and prosthetic treatment protocol were identical. Radiographic crestal bone loss (CBL), plaque score (PS), bleeding on probing (Bop) and probing pocket depth (PPD) were determined at 1 and 6 years after implant placement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 18, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 11, 2025
CompletedFebruary 11, 2025
June 1, 2015
8.4 years
February 6, 2025
February 6, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Crestal bone loss
Radiographic measurement of crestal bone loss
The measurements were performed at 1 and 6 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Plaque
The measurements were performed at 1 and 6 years
Probing pocket depth
The measurements were performed at 1 and 6 years
Bleeding on probing
The measurements were performed at 1 and 6 years
Study Arms (4)
Internal Microthread implant
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach participant received 4 implants, one of each type
Internal Non Microthread implant
EXPERIMENTALExternal microthread implant
EXPERIMENTALExternal Non-Microthread implant
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Each patient received 4 implants to support a bar supported overdenture. One implant is commercially available, 3 implants were experimentally made by the manufacturer for this study. The implants were similar in macro-desing, surface and platform shift but differ in microthread design and implant-abutment connection.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Edentulous in the maxilla and sufficient bone to harvest four 4 x 9 mm implant
You may not qualify if:
- Head -and neck radiation
- Bisphosphonate intake
- Limited prosthetic height
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University
Ghent, Belgium
Related Publications (3)
Doornewaard R, Sakani S, Matthys C, Glibert M, Bronkhorst E, Vandeweghe S, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H. Four-implant-supported overdenture treatment in the maxilla. Part I: A randomized controlled split mouth trial assessing the effect of microthreads and abutment connection type on 4 years peri-implant health. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Oct;23(5):671-679. doi: 10.1111/cid.13037. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
PMID: 34378860BACKGROUNDGlibert M, Vervaeke S, Jacquet W, Vermeersch K, Ostman PO, De Bruyn H. A randomized controlled clinical trial to assess crestal bone remodeling of four different implant designs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):455-462. doi: 10.1111/cid.12604. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
PMID: 29575488BACKGROUNDMatthijs S, Christiaens V, Matthys C, De Bruyn H, Glibert M. A 6-Year Randomized Controlled Trial on Different Implant Designs in Maxillary Overdenture Patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70069. doi: 10.1111/cid.70069.
PMID: 40552788DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hugo De Bruyn
University Ghent
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 6, 2025
First Posted
February 11, 2025
Study Start
September 18, 2015
Primary Completion
February 20, 2024
Study Completion
February 20, 2024
Last Updated
February 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2015-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share