Comparison Between an Electronic Mobile Device and Optical Coherence Tomography to Determine Cup-to-disc Ratio
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was a non-inferiority trial with masked data analysis. Individuals ranging from 18 to 60 years from both genders that met the pre-defined criteria were included. This study was carried out in Recife at Clinica Oftalmologica Zona Sul and at Centro de Informatica-UFPE. Using both equipment, 5 vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) evaluations were performed for each eye of the individuals, under midriatic conditions. Evaluations were done by examiners who did not know previously results obtained from other equipment. Data was collected by the main researcher of this research. This study was approved by the ethics committee before it started and all research members signed the TCLE agreement. The statistical test employed in this study was Pearson Correlation test.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedDecember 9, 2016
December 1, 2016
1 month
June 2, 2016
December 8, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Objective C/D Ratio measure
To measure vertical cup to disc ratio in an objective way
One Year
Study Arms (2)
Electronic Mobile Device
EXPERIMENTALUse an Electronic Low Cost Mobile Device To Determine C/D Ratio And Compare Results With Gold Standard Optical Coherence Tomography Results. The equipment needs mydriatic conditions and does not touch the patient's eye. The equipment uses a panoptik and a camera to access eye fundus.
Optical Coherence Tomography
ACTIVE COMPARATORDevice considered as gold standard to determine c/d ratio. Needs mydriatic conditions.
Interventions
Measure C/D Ratio With An Equipment Attached To A Ophthalmoscope That Will Determine C/D Ratio Without Touching Patient's Eyes. To Perform It We Need Mydriatic Conditions.
Measure C/D Ratio With OCT, Considered Gold Standard Equipment
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Cancer
- Cataract
- Eyes transparency loss
- Best Av \< 0.4
- Eye surgery in the last 12 Months
- Use of drugs that leads to any kind of Neuropathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinica Oftalmologica Zona Sul
Recife, Pernambuco, 51110000, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ANDREA SARMENTO
COZ
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2016
First Posted
December 9, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share