NCT02986724

Brief Summary

The purpose of this non-interventional study (NIS) study is to assess further knowledge on the routine use of Entyvio in inflammatory bowel disease therapy, particularly the use in participants with CD and UC naive to biologics.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2016

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 4, 2017

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

December 6, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Drug therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Percentage of Participants With UC Achieving Clinical Response Based on Partial Mayo Score

    Clinical response is defined as a decrease in the partial Mayo Score of at least 2 points and \>=25% from baseline, with an accompanying decrease in rectal bleeding subscore of \>=1 point from baseline or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of \<=1 point. Mayo score is an instrument designed to measure disease activity of UC. It consists of 3 subscores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and physician rating of disease activity, each graded from 0 to 3 with higher scores indicating more severe disease. These scores are summed to give a total score range of 0 to 9; where higher scores indicating more severe disease. Outcome measure is planned to be assessed in bio-naive participants who receive vedolizumab treatment.

    Baseline up to 52 Weeks

  • Percentage of Participants With CD Achieving Clinical Response Based on Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI)

    Clinical response is defined as a decrease in HBI score of \>=3 points from baseline. HBI score is used to measure the disease activity of CD. It consists of clinical parameters: general well-being (0-4, where higher score means lower well being), abdominal pain (0-3, higher score means more severe pain), number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass (0-3, where higher score means presence of swelling in the abdomen), and complications (score 1 per item). Total score is the sum of individual parameters. The score ranges from a minimum score of 0 to no pre-specified maximum score as it depends on the number of liquid stools, where higher scores indicating more severe disease.

    Baseline up to 52 Weeks

  • Number of Bio-naïve Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

    Baseline up to 52 Weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Percentage of Participants With UC Achieving Clinical Remission Based on Partial Mayo Score

    up to 52 weeks from start of another biological therapy

  • Percentage of Participants With CD Achieving Clinical Remission Based on Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI)

    up to 52 weeks from start of another biological therapy

  • Percentage of Participants With UC Achieving Durable Clinical Response Based on Partial Mayo Score

    up to 52 weeks from start of another biological therapy

  • Percentage of Participants With CD Achieving Durable Clinical Response Based on Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI)

    up to 52 weeks from start of another biological therapy

  • Number of Participants who Failed Vedolizumab Therapy Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events

    up to 52 weeks from start of another biological therapy

Study Arms (1)

Vedolizumab

Bio-naïve participants with UC or CD will be treated with vedolizumab as per local prescriptions from physician in routine medical practice for up to 52 Week. Participants who fail on vedolizumab may be switched during the study to another biologic treatment as prescribed by the physician during routine medical practice for up to 52 Weeks.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Biologically naïve participants with UC or CD undergoing treatment with Vedolizumab (Entyvio) will be evaluated for safety and efficacy.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participant is enrolled in a clinical trial in which treatment for UC or CD is managed through a protocol,
  • Prior treatment with a biologic agent,
  • Any other reason that, in the Investigator's opinion, makes the participant unsuitable to participate in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unknown Facility

Innsbruck, Austria

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Crohn DiseaseColitis, UlcerativeInflammatory Bowel Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

GastroenteritisGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesColitisColonic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2016

First Posted

December 8, 2016

Study Start

January 4, 2017

Primary Completion

August 31, 2020

Study Completion

August 31, 2020

Last Updated

September 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received, an opportunity for the primary publication of the research has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com/Approach for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.

Locations