NCT02986217

Brief Summary

This study seeks to establish the effect of regular structured feedback on surgical performance using crowd sourced video assessments with validated objective performance scores and time to complete a specific surgical procedure through a randomized controlled trial. The working hypothesis is that regular structured assessment will lead to a greater measurable improvement in performance, as defined by objective performance scores, than will traditional feedback methods.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
47

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2016

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 8, 2016

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 25, 2022

Status Verified

October 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

December 6, 2016

Last Update Submit

October 21, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • difference in mean time needed to perform cuff closure during hysterectomy

    The difference in mean time (measured in minutes) needed to perform vaginal cuff closure during hysterectomy between subjects in the control versus experimental groups.

    6 weeks post study enrollment

  • difference in mean surgical performance score

    The difference in mean surgical performance score of a vaginal cuff closure at the time of hysterectomy between participants in the control versus experimental groups.

    6 weeks post study enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • difference in trainee satisfaction with feedback method

    6 weeks post study enrollment

Study Arms (2)

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants randomized to the Control Group will submit a video of surgical performance of vaginal cuff closure during a hysterectomy. Subjects in the control group will receive traditional feedback methods as determined by each participant's training program. Subjects in the control group will repeat the process of video submission of the same procedure using the same surgical approach every 2 weeks for 2 cycles. At 6 weeks, participants will submit a final video performing vaginal cuff closure during hysterectomy.

Experimental Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized to the Experimental Group will submit a video of surgical performance of vaginal cuff closure during a hysterectomy. Subjects in the experimental group will then receive feedback within 5 business days of video submission and repeat the process of video submission of the same procedure using the same surgical approach every 2 weeks for 2 cycles. At 6 weeks, participants will submit a final video performing vaginal cuff closure during hysterectomy.

Other: regular structured assessment of surgical performance

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • current position as a resident in obstetrics and gynecology in a year of training where laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy is regularly performed -- OR -- FMIGS Fellow regularly performing laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy
  • participants must be between 18 and 60 years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • persons not in a position as a resident in obstetrics and gynecology in a year of training where laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy is regularly performed -- OR -- persons not a FMIGS Fellow regularly performing laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy
  • participants younger than 18 and older than 60 years of age

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2016

First Posted

December 8, 2016

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion

February 1, 2019

Study Completion

February 1, 2019

Last Updated

October 25, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-10