Comparison of the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Exenatide Once-weekly Compared to Basal Insulins
A Cohort Study of the Benefits of Bydureon in Customary Clinical Care in the United States
1 other identifier
observational
7,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Exenatide once weekly (Bydureon) was approved in January 2012 by FDA in USA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Evidence from clinical trials suggested that Bydureon improves glucose control with low risk of hypoglycemia. Bydureon does not require a dose titration as necessary for other glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, and appears to have other advantages, such as reducing insulin resistance, reducing weight, and improving blood pressure and lipid profiles. However, the degree to which these advantages of Bydureon lead to improve outcomes in customary clinical care is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of Bydureon relative to basal insulin initiated as first-ever injectable therapeutic regimens used in customary clinical care. Patients who initiated treatment with Bydureon or basal insulin between July 2011 and March 2015 will be recruited into the study cohorts from Optum's database of electronic health records. The two treatment cohorts will be matched by propensity score method.Clinical outcomes of HbA1c, weight, and gastrointestinal symptoms and hypoglycemia are investigated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 28, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 28, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 28, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 28, 2016
CompletedMarch 29, 2017
March 1, 2017
Same day
November 23, 2016
March 28, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes from baseline in HbA1c (%)
To evaluate changes in HbA1c from baseline one year after starting treatment with exenatide once weekly and basal insulin
one year post-index
Changes from baseline in weight (kg)
To evaluate changes in weight (kg) from baseline one year after starting treatment with exenatide once weekly and basal insulin
one year post-index
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Frequency of hypoglycemia
one year post-index
Frequency of nausea
One year post-index
Frequency of vomiting
one year post-index
Frequency of diarrhea and constipation
One year post-index
Study Arms (2)
exenatide once weekly
type 2 diabetes who initiated exenatide once weekly treatment in the index period
basal insulin
type 2 diabetes patients who initiated basal insulin treatment in the index period
Interventions
exenatide treatment in the customary clinical care in the USA
Eligibility Criteria
This cohort study compares injectable-naive exenatide once-weekly and basal insulin initiators. The study cohorts were drawn from an Optum's Electronic Health Records database that integrates records from many medical groups and hospitals in the United States representing over 25,000 physicians and over 25 million patients in ordinary clinical practice. The Electronic Health Records captures clinical, operational, and financial information that physicians record at the time of care. This information includes diagnoses, procedures, medications (prescribed and administered), clinical measures (biometric and laboratory values), and clinical notes (e.g., physician, pathology, and radiology notes).
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years old;
- had received care documented in Electronic Health Records (including at least one out-patient provider visit) for a minimum of 6-months prior index date;
- had at least one diagnosis of type 2 diabetes by The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM: 250.X0 or 250.X2) prior to and including the date of the study drug initiation, with no prior diagnosis of type1 diabetes (ICD-9-CM: 250.X1 or 250.X3), or gestational diabetes within the 6-months prior to index date;
- No evidence of prior injectable antidiabetic treatment, specifically no dispensing of a GLP-1RA or any insulin during the 6-months baseline period prior to study drug initiation
You may not qualify if:
- Prior diagnosis of type1 diabetes (ICD-9-CM: 250.X1 or 250.X3), or gestational diabetes within the 6-months prior to index date;
- Prior dispensing of a GLP-1RA or any insulin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (1)
Optum Epidemiology
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anita M Loughlin, Ph.D
Optum, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2016
First Posted
November 28, 2016
Study Start
October 28, 2014
Primary Completion
October 28, 2014
Study Completion
October 28, 2014
Last Updated
March 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03