Subanalyses of Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Patients or Type 2 Diabetes Patients With Renal Impairment
A Cohort Study of the Benefits of Bydureon in Customary Clinical Care in the United States - Additional Analyses
1 other identifier
observational
6,024
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Exenatide once weekly (Bydureon) was approved in January 2012 by FDA in USA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Evidence from clinical trials suggested that Bydureon improves glucose control with low risk of hypoglycemia. Bydureon does not require a dose titration as necessary for other glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, and appears to have other advantages, such as reducing insulin resistance, reducing weight, and improving blood pressure and lipid profiles. However, the degree to which these advantages of Bydureon lead to improve outcomes in customary clinical care in patients with mild and moderate renal impairment and in elderly patients are unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of Bydureon relative to basal insulin initiated as first-ever injectable therapeutic regimens among elderly patients and patients with renal impairment. Patients who initiated treatment with Bydureon or basal insulin between July 2011 and March 2015 will be recruited into the study cohorts from Optum's database of electronic health records. The two treatment cohorts will be matched by propensity score method. Changes in HbA1c, weight, markers for renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, and albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR)), and incidences of gastrointestinal symptoms and hypoglycaemia are investigated for patients with different eGFR categories and with different ages.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2016
CompletedMarch 29, 2018
March 1, 2018
Same day
September 8, 2016
March 27, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes from baseline in HbA1c (%)
To evaluate changes in HbA1c (%) from baseline after initiation of therapy with exenatide once-weekly in patients with different renal functions or age classes, as referred to basal insulin initiators of the same subgroups.
one year post-index
Changes from baseline in weight (kg)
To evaluate changes in weight (kg) from baseline after initiation of therapy with exenatide once-weekly in patients with different renal functions or age classes, as referred to basal insulin initiators of the same subgroups.
one year post-index
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Changes from baseline in eGFR
one year post-index
Frequency of Hypoglycemia
one year post-index
Frequency of Nausea
one year post-index
Frequency of Vomiting
one year post-index
Study Arms (2)
Exenatide once weekly initiators
Type 2 diabetes patients who initiated exenatide once weekly treatment during the index period
Basal Insulin initiator cohort
Type 2 diabetes patients who initiated basal insulin treatment in the index period
Interventions
Exenatide treatment in customary clinical care in the USA
basal insulin tretament in the customary clinical care in USA
Eligibility Criteria
The study population was drawn from an Optum's Electronic Health Records (EHR) database. Injectable-naive type 2 diabetic patients who initiated therapy with either Exenatide once-weekly or basal insulin from January 2012 to January 2015, with follow-up through March 2015 were identified. The baseline period was defined as the 183 days (6-months) prior to date of study drug initiation (index date). Patients with Type 2 diabetes were identified using structured diagnosis fields and International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Initiations of Exenatide once-weekly or basal insulin were identified in the EHR data capturing prescribed medications using National Drug Codes (NDC).
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years old;
- had received care documented in EHR (including at least one out-patient provider visit) for a minimum of 6-months prior index date;
- had at least one diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (ICD-9-CM: 250.X0 or 250.X2) prior to and including the date of the study drug initiation, with no prior diagnosis of type1 diabetes (ICD-9-CM: 250.X1 or 250.X3), or gestational diabetes within the 6-months prior to index date;
- No evidence of prior injectable antidiabetic treatment, specifically no dispensing of a GLP-1-RA or any insulin during the 6-months baseline period prior to study drug initiation
You may not qualify if:
- Prior diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (ICD-9-CM: 250.X1 or 250.X3), or gestational diabetes within the 6-months prior to index date;
- Prior dispensing of a GLP-1RA or any insulin
- Missing data on renal function defined by eGFR or age
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (1)
Optum Epidemiology
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Related Publications (1)
Loughlin AM, Qiao Q, Nunes AP, Ohman P, Ezzy S, Yochum L, Clifford CR, Gately R, Dore DD, Seeger JD. Effectiveness and tolerability of therapy with exenatide once weekly vs basal insulin among injectable-drug-naive elderly or renal impaired patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):898-909. doi: 10.1111/dom.13175. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
PMID: 29193561BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anita M Loughlin, Ph.D
Optum, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2016
First Posted
September 28, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03