Amlodipine Versus Valsartan for Improvement of Diastolic Dysfunction Associated With Hypertension
Effect of Add-on of Amlodipine Versus Valsartan on Diastolic Dysfunction Associated With Hypertension
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Hypertensive patients are at increased risk of developing LV hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis, which cause diastolic dysfunction. Because the activation of rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has been shown to induce LV hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis, the RAAS may play a central role in the pathogenic process from hypertension to diastolic HF. Inhibitors of RAAS have been considered as a treatment option for these patients, and the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) have been of interest because they antagonize the effects of angiotensin II more completely. However, the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Systolic Function (I-PRESERVE) trial reported that treatment with irbesartan did not reduce the risk of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes among 4,128 patients who had HF with a preserved LV ejection fraction. The degree of improvement of diastolic dysfunction was associated with the extent of systolic blood pressure reduction, whether a RAAS inhibitor or non-RAAS blood pressure lowering was used. Amlodipine is a potent and well-tolerated calcium channel blocker, and seems to be appropriate for achieving more aggressive systolic blood pressure target and improving diastolic dysfunction in hypertensive patients, because amlodipine is clinically very useful for controlling systolic blood pressure. Assessment of diastolic function by echocardiography will be helpful to determine whether addition of amlodipine or an ARB to standard therapy is more beneficial to hypertensive patients with diastolic dysfunction. The investigators hypothesize that amlodipine added to standard therapy will be superior to valsartan in improving diastolic dysfunction by lowering systolic blood pressure more effectively in hypertensive patients, and try to examine this hypothesis in a prospective, open-label, randomized comparison study using blinded echocardiographic evaluation for end point.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 hypertension
Started Dec 2016
Typical duration for phase_4 hypertension
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 6, 2020
CompletedJanuary 14, 2020
January 1, 2020
3.1 years
November 22, 2016
January 12, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the ratio of E velocity (Early mitral inflow velocity) to E' velocity (Early mitral annular velocity)
24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in systolic blood pressure
24 weeks
Change in global LV longitudinal strain
24 weeks
Change in LV mass
24 weeks
Change in left atrial volume
24 weeks
Change in clinical composite
24 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Amlodipine
EXPERIMENTALAmlodipine 2.5mg added to antihypertensive therapy
Valsartan
EXPERIMENTALValsartan 40mg added to antihypertensive therapy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Controlled hypertension: systolic BP \< 150 and diastolic BP \< 90 mmHg in persons aged 60 years or older, systolic BP \< 140 and diastolic BP \< 90 mmHg in persons 40 through 59 years according to the JNC 8th guideline
- Evidence of diastolic dysfunction showing E/E' \> 10
- The patient agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and echocardiographic follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site
You may not qualify if:
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol
- Planned cardiac surgery or planned major non-cardiac surgery within the study period.
- Stroke or coronary revascularization in the past 6 months.
- Clinically significant pulmonary disease.
- Untreated hyperthyroidism, or hypothyroidism.
- A diagnosis of cancer (other than superficial squamous or basal cell skin cancer) in the past 3 years or current treatment for the active cancer.
- Female of child-bearing potential who do not use adequate contraception and women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study.
- LV ejection fraction \< 50%.
- Significant renal disease manifested by serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dL
- Hepatic disease or biliary tract obstruction, or significant hepatic enzyme elevation (ALT or AST \> 3 times upper limit of normal).
- History of intolerance to ARB or amlodipine.
- Hypertrophic or restrictive cardiomyopathy.
- Moderate or severe valvular disease.
- Constrictive pericarditis
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Asan Medical Centerlead
- Yuhan Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Busan Baik Hospital
Busan, South Korea
Busan University Hospital
Busan, South Korea
Chungnam University Hospital
Daejeon, South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Duk-Hyun Kang, M.D.
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2016
First Posted
November 25, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 6, 2020
Study Completion
January 6, 2020
Last Updated
January 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share