Comparision of Blood Pressure Variability Between Amlodipine and Losartan
The COMPAriSon of Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Central Blood Pressure of Calcium Channel Blocker (Amlodipine) in Comparison With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (Losartan) in Patients With Essential Hypertension
1 other identifier
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Blood pressure (BP) is believed to be a major determinant of vascular disease, and BP lowering is the most important goal in hypertension treatment. Thus, clinical guidelines for hypertension are mainly focused on lowering mean BP. However, despite an increasing incidence of stroke with age, the association between systolic BP (SBP) and the risk of stroke decreases with age. This disparity highlights a gap in the link between BP and vascular-related diseases (i.e., stroke). In clinical practice, visit-to-visit fluctuations in BP have been largely ignored and are thought to be an unreliable finding, even though this phenomenon is frequently observed. Rothwell et al. demonstrated that the visit-to-visit variability in SBP was a more powerful independent predictor of stroke than mean SBP, and that an increased residual variability in SBP in treated hypertensive patients was also a strong predictor of stroke and coronary events. Recently updated (2011) hypertension guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommend an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) \[or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB)\] and calcium-channel blocker (CCB) as a first line drug. Although the significance of BP variability (BPV) has been illustrated, the main focus of the current guidelines is to reduce systolic and diastolic BP, not BPV. In the X-CELLENT study, a CCB (amlodipine) and thiazide-like diuretic drug (indapamide sustained-release) led to a significant reduction in BPV, compared to an ARB (candesartan). In addition, the CCB showed the most effective reduction in systolic BPV among the antihypertensive drug class in a meta-analysis. However, there are no direct comparison studies of a CCB and ARB on BPV. Thus, we aim to compare the systolic BPV effects of a CCB versus an ARB in essential hypertensive patients. The primary hypothesis is that an ARB is not inferior to a CCB in the reduction of the systolic BPV standard deviation (SD) in essential hypertensive patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 hypertension
Started Apr 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_4 hypertension
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 17, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedMay 12, 2017
May 1, 2017
4 years
October 10, 2013
May 11, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
SD of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability
Consecutive measured blood pressure values from each visit will be averaged, and the standard deviation (SD) is calculated using the mean systolic blood pressure of each visit.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Central systolic blood pressure
6 months
Augmentation index of central blood pressure
6 months
Standard deviation of within-visit systolic blood pressure variability
6 months
Coefficient of variation of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability
6 months
Variation independent of the mean of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability
6 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Safety outcome
6 months
Study Arms (2)
CCB (amlodipine)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients who fail to respond to 5 mg oral amlodipine daily, the dose will be titrated up to 10 mg amlodipineh. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (\>140 mmHg) or diastolic (\>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
ARB (losartan)
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients who fail to respond to 50 mg oral losartan daily, the dose will be titrated up to 100 mg losartan. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (\>140 mmHg) or diastolic (\>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
Interventions
Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either an amlodipine or a losartan group by a computer-generated random number table. For patients who fail to respond to 5 mg amlodipine, the dose will be titrated up to 10 mg amlodipine. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (\>140 mmHg) or diastolic (\>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
Eligible subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either an amlodipine or a losartan group by a computer-generated random number table. For patients who fail to respond to 50 mg losartan, the dose will be titrated up to 100 mg losartan. At subsequent visits, additional antihypertensive therapy (hydrochlorothiazide) will be added if systolic (\>140 mmHg) or diastolic (\>90 mmHg) BP is inadequate. Study drugs are administered once a day for 24 weeks. The dose will be titrated up if SBP is over 90 mmHg or there are no symptoms of hypotension (syncope, loss of consciousness, or orthostatic hypotension). If up-titration is not tolerable, because of side effects or hypotension, the previous dose will be administered as the final tolerable dose.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 20 years or older and below 80 years.
- Patients who have not previously taken any antihypertensive drugs or have discontinued previous antihypertensive drugs for 2 weeks.
- Mean SBP ≥140 mmHg or mean diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg (blood pressure will be checked at least 2 times in a seated position during the screening period).
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women, possible candidate for pregnancy, or breastfeeding women.
- Known or suspected secondary hypertension.
- Mean seated SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or mean seated diastolic BP ≥ 120 mmHg at any visit.
- Any clinically significant hepatic impairments.
- Severe renal impairment (serum creatinine level \> 3.0 mg/dL or creatinine clearance \< 30 mL/min).
- Bilateral renal artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, or post-renal transplant.
- Clinically relevant hyperkalemia.
- Uncorrected volume or sodium depletion.
- Suspected primary aldosteronism.
- Hypertension and spontaneous or low-dose diuretic-induced hypokalemia.
- Drug-resistant hypertension, defined as sub-optimally controlled hypertension on a 3-drug program that includes an adrenergic inhibitor, vasodilator, and diuretic.
- Hypertension with adrenal incidentaloma.
- Hypertension and a family history of early-onset hypertension or cerebrovascular accident at a young age (\<40 years).
- Hypertensive first-degree relatives of patients with primary aldosteronism.
- Symptomatic congestive heart failure.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wonju Severance Christian Hospitallead
- Pfizercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, Gangwon-do, 220-701, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Byung-Su Yoo, MD, PhD
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 10, 2013
First Posted
October 17, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 12, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05