Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy (PBMT) in Total Hip Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Osteoarthritis (OA), a chronic degenerative muscle disease characterized by cartilage wear, causes progressive joint deformity and loss of function leading to the indication of total hip arthroplasty (THA), when conservative treatments fail. Surgical trauma leads to pain and induces an immune response. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has proven effective in tissue repair by modulating the inflammatory process and promoting pain relief. It can therefore be part of the treatment. This study aims to analyze the effect of PMBT on inflammation and pain of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. The study consisted of eighteen patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and they received phototherapy in a period from 8 to 12 hours after surgery. We divided the patients into two groups (n=9 each) placebo and effective phototherapy. The patients were evaluated before and after phototherapy with 9 diodes, applied to 5 points along the scar (1 laser 905nm, 4 LEDs 875nm and 4 LEDs 640nm, 40.3J total), by visual analogue scale (VAS) and blood collection for analysis of the levels of the cytokines TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 22, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2017
CompletedApril 20, 2017
April 1, 2017
9 months
November 1, 2016
April 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of Pain (VAS)
A visual analogue scale (VAS) of 100 mm was used for the self-rating of the patients pain intensity, with assistance of a blinded researcher. Pain assessments were performed at baseline, immediately after phototherapy irradiation.
Change from baseline in VAS to immediately after phototherapy
Evaluation of Cytokines levels (ELISA immunoenzymatic assay)
Cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α) in blood samples collected from patients before and after irradiation of phototherapy were evaluated using the Duo Set kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Change from baseline in Cytokines levels to immediately after phototherapy
Study Arms (2)
Placebo group
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects received placebo therapy. The placebo Portable Pain Away™ device was identical to the active device, displayed the same settings and emitted the same sound regardless of the comparator.
PBMT group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects received active photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT). The active Portable Pain Away™ device was identical to the placebo device, displayed the same settings and emitted the same sound.
Interventions
Portable Pain Away™ device (manufactured by Multi Radiance Medical, Solon - OH, USA) - placebo or active phototherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Men and women with clinical diagnosis of OA based on radiological images in the anteroposterior and profile according to Demur classification.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Men and women with other clinical diagnosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Beneficência Nossa Senhora do Pari
São Paulo, São Paulo, 03031-040, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MsC, PhD candidate
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 2016
First Posted
November 22, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04