Trinity Elite in Lumbar Fusion
A Prospective, Post Market, Multi-center, Open Label, Non-Randomized Clinical Study of the Efficacy of Using Trinity ELITE in Lumbar Fusion Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
300
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This prospective, post-market, open label clinical study is designed to examine the lumbar fusion rate at 24 months post operative in subjects who have undergone a lumbar fusion surgery using Trinity Elite with or without local bone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 15, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 21, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2022
CompletedAugust 11, 2021
August 1, 2021
5.4 years
November 15, 2016
August 10, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
lumbar fusion by CT scan following arthrodesis using Trinity Elite
CT scan of the lumbar vertebral column will be used to determine the fusion status of the spine after Trinity Elite was used in the lateral gutters and in the facet joints. The number of bridging bony cortices will be recorded by blinded reviewers and tabulated. The data will be reported as n
24 months
number of participants with treatment related adverse events
AEs collected on an ongoing basis, reviewed by the Investigators and medical monitor
24 months
Interventions
cell based allograft
Eligibility Criteria
age \>= 18 years of age
You may qualify if:
- Subject must be 18 years of age (≥ 18 years) or older at the time of consent.
- Subject must have a documented diagnosis of DDD. DDD is defined by back and/or radicular pain with degeneration of the disc as confirmed by medical history, physical examination, and radiographic studies that may include CT, MRI, plain X-ray film, discography, myelography, etc. with one or more of the following findings:
- Instability as defined by \>3mm translation or \>5 degrees angulation
- Osteophyte formation of facet joints or vertebral endplates
- Decreased disc height, on average by \>2mm, but dependent upon the spinal level
- Scarring/thickening of ligamentum flavum, annulus fibrosis, or facet joint capsule
- Herniated nucleus pulposus
- Facet joint degeneration/changes; and/or
- Vacuum phenomenon
- Subject may have up to a Grade 2 Spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine with clinical manifestations of one or more of the following phenomena:
- Radiculopathy
- Sensory deficit
- Motor weakness
- Reflex changes
- Subject must require lumbar arthrodesis at 1-4 contiguous levels (L1-S1) for a PLF approach and 1-2 contiguous levels for an interbody approach.
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is under 18 years of age (\<18) at the time of consent
- Subject has had prior lumbar spine fusion surgery at any level
- Subject has greater than grade 2 spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine
- Subject is currently undergoing treatment for malignancy or has undergone treatment for malignancy in the past 5 years (benign skin cancer is permitted)
- Subject is pregnant or nursing or planning to become pregnant during the two years (24 months) following arthrodesis
- Subject has an active local or systemic infection or is undergoing adjunctive treatment for local or systemic infection
- Subject requires supplemental interbody arthrodesis.
- Subject has an allergy to DMSO.
- Subject is a prisoner.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Orthofix Inc.lead
Related Publications (3)
Lansford T, Park DK, Wind JJ, Nunley P, Peppers TA, Russo A, Hassanzadeh H, Sembrano J, Yoo J, Sales J. High Lumbar Spinal Fusion Rates Using Cellular Bone Allograft Irrespective of Surgical Approach. Int J Spine Surg. 2024 Sep 12;18(4):355-364. doi: 10.14444/8612.
PMID: 39054302DERIVEDRusso A, Park DK, Lansford T, Nunley P, Peppers TA, Wind JJ, Hassanzadeh H, Sembrano J, Yoo J, Sales J. Impact of surgical risk factors for non-union on lumbar spinal fusion outcomes using cellular bone allograft at 24-months follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 3;25(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07456-4.
PMID: 38702654DERIVEDPark DK, Wind JJ, Lansford T, Nunley P, Peppers TA, Russo A, Hassanzadeh H, Sembrano J, Yoo J, Sales J. Twenty-four-month interim results from a prospective, single-arm clinical trial evaluating the performance and safety of cellular bone allograft in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Nov 17;24(1):895. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06996-5.
PMID: 37978378DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alan Daniels, MD
Brown University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Park, MD
Beaumont Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fernando Techy, MD
ClinTech Center for Spine Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 15, 2016
First Posted
November 21, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 1, 2022
Last Updated
August 11, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08