Pre-procedure Planning for Liver Biopsy or Radiofrequency Ablation Using CT or MR/US Fusing Imaging
1 other identifier
interventional
185
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether fusion technique of preradiofrequency ablation (RFA) or percutaneous liver biopsy cross-sectional imaging (CT or MR) and real-time ultrasonography would improve feasibility of RFA or liver biopsy in patients with liver tumor in comparison with ultrasonography guidance alone. And assessment of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with another pSWE technique (ARFI).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2016
CompletedNovember 18, 2016
November 1, 2016
10 months
November 16, 2016
November 16, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
RFA or biopsy feasibility rates on planning USG with/without fusion CT/MR and US
comparison of rates of RFA feasibility on conventional planning USG and on fusion planning USG
10 minutes after finishing planning USG
Assessment of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave)
To assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with another pSWE technique (ARFI).
10 minutes after finishing planning USG
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rate of tumor visibility on planning USG with/without fusion technique
10 minutes after finishing planning USG
Number of patients with safety access route on planning USG with/without fusion technique
10 minutes after finishing planning USG
Study Arms (1)
CT/US fusion
EXPERIMENTALpatients undergo routine conventional feasibility planning ultrasound, and clinical decision of percutaneous liver biopsy or RFA feasibility is made based on conventional planning ultrasound. Then additional planning ultrasound using CT/US fusion technique is immediately performed by the same operator, and clinical decision is made based on fusion imaging.
Interventions
Fusion of pre-procedure cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and real-time USG using registration function of USG device.
ultrasound shear wave elastography is performed in S-shear wave scanner according to guidelines of ultrasound elastography.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- referred to Radiology in our institution for liver tumor RFA or percutaneous liver biopsy
- available pre-procedure liver CT or liver MR imaging within 6 weeks
You may not qualify if:
- any contraindication of liver RFA or percutaneous liver biopsy • any patients who received treatment between pre-RFA imaging and planned RFA.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2016
First Posted
November 18, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 18, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share