Study Stopped
Inadequate recruitment
Methods to Detect Liver Fibrosis
Comparison of Non-invasive Methods to Detect and Quantify Liver Fibrosis
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to learn more about liver fibrosis and methods to detect it. We will evaluate and compare multiple MRI based measures of liver fibrosis in subjects with and without liver disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2018
CompletedJanuary 29, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.9 years
January 19, 2017
January 27, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
MR imaging vs. histologic scoring in hepatic fibrosis
Correlate the results from the different imaging sequences designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
MRI reproducibility
2 years
Study Arms (4)
Health/Normal Controls
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealth/normal control subjects will undergo MRI using several different imaging sequences (MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer) designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis.
F1/F2 fibrosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORType 1 and 2 liver fibrosis subjects will undergo MRI using several different imaging sequences (MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer) designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis.
F3/F4 fibrosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORType 2 and 3 liver fibrosis subjects will undergo MRI using several different imaging sequences (MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer) designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis.
Hepatic steatosis with fibrosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORHepatic steatosis with liver fibrosis subjects will undergo MRI using several different imaging sequences (MR Elastography, T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T1 rho, and magnetization transfer) designed to detect and quantify hepatic fibrosis.
Interventions
MRI scan performed on 1.5T Philips Ingenia MRI scanner.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Group 1:
- Healthy subjects with no known or suspected liver disease
- Age 8 - 21 years
- Groups 2 and 3:
- Biopsy confirmed liver fibrosis (F1/F2 Group 2, F3/F4 Group 3)
- Age 8 - 21 years
- Group 4:
- Biopsy confirmed hepatic steatosis AND biopsy confirmed liver fibrosis (any stage)
- Age 8 - 21 years
You may not qualify if:
- All subjects:
- Subjects \<8 years of age and \>21 years of age.
- BMI \> 35 kg/m2
- Subjects deemed to possibly require sedation to undergo MR imaging
- Inability to lie still for 90 minutes
- Pregnancy (verbal pregnancy screens - per standard practice in Radiology - will be administered to all female participants of child-bearing age at the time of enrollment and again immediately prior to imaging)
- Prior history of liver transplantation
- Group 1
- ALT ≥30 U/L
- Clinical history or lab/biopsy results suggestive of the presence of liver disease including: steatosis, fibrosis, inflammation, tumor, etc.
- Group 2 and 3
- Diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
- Biopsy \>6 months prior to research MRI examination
- Initiation of any medications (e.g. steroids, immunosuppressants, antivirals) or procedures (e.g. Kasai portoenterostomy) to treat the liver disease during the time between liver biopsy and study visit
- Group 4
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States
Related Publications (2)
Sporea I, Bota S, Jurchis A, Sirli R, Gradinaru-Tascau O, Popescu A, Ratiu I, Szilaski M. Acoustic radiation force impulse and supersonic shear imaging versus transient elastography for liver fibrosis assessment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Nov;39(11):1933-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
PMID: 23932281BACKGROUNDXanthakos SA, Podberesky DJ, Serai SD, Miles L, King EC, Balistreri WF, Kohli R. Use of magnetic resonance elastography to assess hepatic fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease. J Pediatr. 2014 Jan;164(1):186-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.050. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
PMID: 24064151BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2017
First Posted
January 23, 2017
Study Start
January 26, 2017
Primary Completion
December 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 30, 2018
Last Updated
January 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share