NCT02966223

Brief Summary

The primary question of interest is quantifying the relationship between Y-90 liver therapy and liver damage. Little is known on this subject. Present assumptions and calculations of Y-90 administration are based on surgical lobar hepatectomies and external radiation beam therapies. The investigators hope that by using a functional model of the liver, the investigators can improve this important knowledge gap. The investigators will be enrolling patients planning to receive Y-90 therapy for the treatment of liver malignancies. The diagnosis of a primary liver cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is usually made by a combination of specific imaging findings and clinical criteria; only rarely is a confirmatory biopsy performed. This is due to the high accuracy of the present diagnostic model and the significant risk of biopsy and tumor seeding. Y-90 therapy involves administering radioactive particles to liver tumors by placing a catheter in a hepatic artery supplying the tumor using angiographic techniques and injection of these particles. Y-90 Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET/CT) imaging has been established as a method to validate and quantitate distribution of Yttrium after Y-90 administration. The post Y-90 therapy PET/CT images provide an imaging distribution of the Y-90, which is essential for validation of administered versus planned dose to the liver lesion and background liver. If the investigators can compare the Y-90 distribution to estimate background liver radiation distribution and dose (generated by the Y-90 PET/CT scan) combined with the global and regional function map (generated by the hepatobiliary \[HIDA\] scan performed before and after therapy), then the investigators will be assuming that the difference pre and post therapy in global and regional function can be ascribed to the Y-90 administration. The investigators will also analyze the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and CT sets performed before and after therapy and correlate the imaging results collected with clinical findings such as ascites/encephalopathy and routine serological markers (bilirubin, albumin, International normalized ratio \[INR\], etc.). With this information, the investigators will have the potential to establish whether there is a relationship between Y-90 distribution to non-tumoral (normal) hepatic parenchyma and the incidence and severity of Radioembolization-Induced Liver Disease (REILD). This would have the potential to improve selection criteria and outcomes in populations selected for Y-90 therapy in the future.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2016

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 17, 2016

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 17, 2017

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 15, 2019

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 24, 2020

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 25, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2020

Status Verified

September 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

November 8, 2016

Results QC Date

June 5, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary

    Difference in regional liver function between pre and 3 months post Yttrium 90 delivery using the HIDA functional imaging scans.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Secondary

    3 months

  • Secondary

    6 months

Study Arms (1)

MRI and HIDA scan

EXPERIMENTAL
Radiation: MRI and HIDA scan

Interventions

Pre y90 therapy each subject will undergo a HIDA and MRI scan. 3 months post Y90 - Each subject will undergo a second HIDA scan and MRI scan

MRI and HIDA scan

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Subjects must be ≥ 18 years of age at the time of signing informed consent.
  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and a treatment plan to undergo radioembolization therapy with Y-90 at Indiana University Health Hospital.
  • Subjects must be willing and able to comply with all procedures and visits required for this protocol (pre-treatment, during treatment, and post-treatment).

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects who have contraindications for receiving Y-90 therapy and any routine procedures and imaging associated with Y-90 therapy, including subjects who are pregnant or are planning to become pregnant, will not be eligible to participate in this study. Female subjects who are of childbearing potential should inform her treating physician should she become pregnant at any time during the course of the study.
  • Subjects with contraindications for receiving hepatobiliary scans (HIDA scans) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI scans) will not be eligible to participate in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Indiana University Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Liver Neoplasms

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spectrum AnalysisChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative Techniques

Limitations and Caveats

The trial was halted prematurely because sponsor withdrew funding. There is insufficient data to analyze.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Mark Tann, MD
Organization
Indiana University

Study Officials

  • Mark Tann, MD

    Indiana University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Radiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2016

First Posted

November 17, 2016

Study Start

August 17, 2017

Primary Completion

July 15, 2019

Study Completion

April 24, 2020

Last Updated

September 25, 2020

Results First Posted

September 25, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No plan to share

Locations