Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI in Diagnosing and Staging Liver Cancer Using UNOS Policy
ACRIN6690
A Prospective, Multicenter Comparison of Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced CT and Multiphase Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Transplant Allocation
4 other identifiers
interventional
440
1 country
9
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Diagnostic procedures, such as contrast-enhanced CT scan and contrast-enhanced MRI, may help find liver cancer and find out how far the disease has spread. PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying contrast-enhanced CT scan and contrast-enhanced MRI in diagnosing and staging liver cancer in patients with chronic liver disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedJuly 7, 2023
July 1, 2023
13 years
March 5, 2010
July 5, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity of contrast-enhanced CT scan vs contrast-enhanced MRI for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Within 90 Days Before Transplantation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Positive predictive value (PPV) of CT scan vs MRI for diagnosing HCC
Within 90 Days Before Transplantation
Lesion-level sensitivity and PPV of contrast CT scan vs contrast MRI
Within 90 Days Before Transplantation
Sensitivity and specificity of multiphase contrast-enhanced CT scan vs MRI for diagnosing residual or recurrent HCC
Within 90 Days Before Transplantation
Accuracy of imaging-based diagnosis and staging of HCC in clinical practice using the new OPTN liver-imaging criteria compared with the reference standard of pathologic diagnosis and staging at the time of explantation
Within 90 Days Before Transplantation
Diagnostic value of sensitivity and PPV when patients are stratified by AFP level (elevated vs normal)
Within 90 Days Before Transplantation
Study Arms (1)
Waitlisted with HCC-Exception Points
EXPERIMENTALParticipants undergo CT and MRI every 90 days for the trial with iodinated contrast dye and motexafin gadolinium, during liver transplant wait listing. Possible Eovist-enhanced MRI substudy participation
Interventions
iodinated Radiocontrast dye for imaging enhancement
motexafin gadolinium
A sub-study introduces the Eovist contrast agent for MRI scans at the same time points as the parent policy-assessment trial.
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5499, United States
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90089-9181, United States
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
Lahey Clinic Medical Center - Burlington
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0942, United States
Washington University, St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63130, United States
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4283, United States
The Methodist Hospital for Liver Disease and Transplant
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (2)
Wald C, Nalesnik M, Pomfret EA, et al.: ACRIN 6690: can contemporary imaging reduce false-positive rate in liver transplant (LT) allocation? A multicenter comparison of CT and MRI for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 29 (Suppl 15): A-TPS177, 2011.
RESULTMitchell DG, Bruix J, Sherman M, Sirlin CB. LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System): summary, discussion, and consensus of the LI-RADS Management Working Group and future directions. Hepatology. 2015 Mar;61(3):1056-65. doi: 10.1002/hep.27304. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
PMID: 25041904DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christoph Wald, MD, PhD
Lahey Clinic Medical Center - Burlington
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2010
First Posted
March 8, 2010
Study Start
December 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
July 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Data sharing plan is available on-line at https://www.acrin.org/RESEARCHERS/POLICIES/DATAANDIMAGESHARINGPOLICY.aspx