A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic Delivery
A Split Mouth, Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of an Array of 2x3 Pyramidal Microneedles of 280µm Height Versus a Standard 30-gauge Dental Needle in the Delivery of Local Anaesthetic Solution for Dental Procedures
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study will be completed as a two part, prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Five volunteers (dentists) will be recruited in the first part of the study to evaluate and examine the microneedle device and its use. Based on those qualitative findings (individual interviews and focus group) modifications to the microneedle device will be implemented before part two of the study commences. Twenty volunteers will be enrolled in the second part of the study. A split mouth design will be used to compare the efficacy of an array of 2x3 pyramidal wet-etch silicone microneedles of 280µm height with a standard 30-gauge short hypodermic needle in the delivery of local dental anaesthetic solution. Quantitative and qualitative measurements of the pain experienced and the depth of anaesthesia achieved will be recorded and compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 4, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 8, 2017
CompletedJanuary 25, 2018
January 1, 2018
3 months
November 4, 2016
January 23, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Evaluation
Discomfort / pain intensity rating will be recorded by using a visual analogue scale (VAS)
Immediately after injection of the anaesthetic
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Pain Experience
Immediately after injection of the anaesthetic
Electronic Pulp Test
15 minutes after injection
Thermal Pulp Test
10 minutes after injection
Pin-Prick Test
2 minute intervals alternating with fine touch test until onset of soft tissue anaesthesia
Fine Touch Test
2 minute intervals alternating with pin-prick test until onset of soft tissue anaesthesia
Study Arms (2)
Microneedle Device
EXPERIMENTALLocal Dental Anaesthetic Solution Delivery System: Microneedle device with an array of 2x3 pyramidal wet-etch silicone microneedles of 280µm height to inject anaesthetic solution.
30-gauge Short Hypodermic Needle
ACTIVE COMPARATORLocal Dental Anaesthetic Solution Delivery System: Standard thirty-gauge short hypodermic needle to inject anaesthetic solution.
Interventions
Injection of 1.2ml of a standard local dental anaesthetic solution \[1.2ml of 2% lidocaine and 1:80,000 epinephrine (lidocaine 20 mg/ml, epinephrine 12.5 mμ/ml)\] at a rate of 1 mL/min.
Injection of 1.2ml of a standard local dental anaesthetic solution \[1.2ml of 2% lidocaine and 1:80,000 epinephrine (lidocaine 20 mg/ml, epinephrine 12.5 mμ/ml)\] at a rate of 1 mL/min.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals are considered eligible for the study if they are not taking any medications and are deemed competent to complete the McGill pain questionnaire short-form (MPQ-SF) and visual analogue scale (VAS).
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals will be excluded from the study if they suffer from the following conditions:
- Hypersensitivity to anaesthetics of the amide type
- Epilepsy
- Hypertension, impaired cardiac conduction
- Impaired respiratory function
- Impaired hepatic function
- Cerebrovascular insufficiency
- Thyrotoxicosis
- Interventions not permitted during the study include the use of steroids, analgesics or other non-steroidal inflammatory drugs and smoking.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Dublin, Trinity Collegelead
- Tyndall National Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Dublin, Ireland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Darius Sagheri
University of Dublin, Trinity College
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ciarán P Devine
University of Dublin, Trinity College
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
June H Nunn
University of Dublin, Trinity College
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Erica Donnelly-Swift
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Orthodontic Therapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 4, 2016
First Posted
November 17, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 8, 2017
Last Updated
January 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share