Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of Aqueduct 100-device
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of using Aqueduct -100 - Cervical Dilator Device, focusing on diagnostic or operative hysteroscopies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2017
CompletedNovember 9, 2016
November 1, 2016
11 months
November 2, 2016
November 7, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of patients in which, through 1 minute dilation with Aqueduct-100, a cervix dilation of 5mm, required for diagnostic/ operative hysteroscopy, is reached.
Efficacy evaluation of Aqueduct-100
Through study completion, an average of 11 months
Occurrence of Adverse Events
In vivo safety evaluation of using Aqueduct-100
Through study completion, an average of 11 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of physicians'overall satisfaction with the device, through a questionnaire
Through study completion, an average of 11 months
Study Arms (1)
Aqueduct 100 dilation
EXPERIMENTALUterine cervix dilation through Aqueduct-100 device
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects, females, 18 years of age or older.
- Subjects undergoing diagnostic or operative hysteroscopies
- Subjects willing to sign informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects younger than 18 years of age
- Subjects unwilling to sign the informed consent form
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Baptist Medical Arts Surgical Center, Gynecology Department
Miami, Florida, 33176, United States
Related Publications (7)
Mazza E, Nava A, Bauer M, Winter R, Bajka M, Holzapfel GA. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal. 2006 Apr;10(2):125-36. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2005.06.001. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
PMID: 16143559BACKGROUNDBuhimschi, C.; Buhimschi, I.; Malinow, A.; Saade, G.; Garfield, R.; Weiner, C., The Forces of Labour. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 2003, 14 (4), 273-307.
BACKGROUNDMyers KM, Paskaleva AP, House M, Socrate S. Mechanical and biochemical properties of human cervical tissue. Acta Biomater. 2008 Jan;4(1):104-16. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
PMID: 17904431BACKGROUNDKenyon NJ, Stevens JC, Stewart P, Black MM, Clifford A. A critical investigation of the measurement of the force required to dilate the human uterine cervix. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1988 May;9(2):155-61. doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/9/2/008.
PMID: 3391017BACKGROUNDS. Febvay, S. Socrate and M.D. House. Biomechanical modeling of cervical tissue. A quantitative investigation of cervical funneling. Proceedings of the ASME 2003 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Washington, D.C., November 2003.
BACKGROUNDArsenijevic S, Vukcevic-Globarevic G, Volarevic V, Macuzic I, Todorovic P, Tanaskovic I, Mijailovic M, Raicevic S, Jeremic B. Continuous controllable balloon dilation: a novel approach for cervix dilation. Trials. 2012 Oct 22;13:196. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-196.
PMID: 23088906BACKGROUNDNicolaides KH, Welch CC, MacPherson MB, Johnson IR, Filshie GM. Lamicel: a new technique for cervical dilatation before first trimester abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 May;90(5):475-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08947.x.
PMID: 6849849BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Larry Spiegelman, Dr.
Baptist Medical Arts Surgical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2016
First Posted
November 9, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 9, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-11