Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of Aqueduct -100 Device
1 other identifier
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the present clinical investigation is to collect data regarding the safety and effectiveness of the Aqueduct 100 device. The effectiveness of the Aqueduct 100 will be determined by evaluating the ability to reach desired cervical dilation, and the time frame required to reach desired cervical dilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2017
CompletedMay 8, 2017
May 1, 2017
6 months
July 25, 2016
May 4, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of patients with dilation of cervix to a pre-determined diameter before the intrauterine procedure using Aqueduct-100 device.
The primary outcome of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the Aqueduct-100 device to dilate the uterine cervices to the desired diameter.
Through study completion, approximately 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Occurrence of Adverse Events: rate, list and severity of AEs and SAEs.
Through study completion, approximately 9 months
Time frame required to reach desired cervical dilation from start time (insertion of device) to completion of dilation (removal of catheter)
Through study completion, approximately 9 months
Measurement of physicians' satisfaction with the device, through the use of a questionnaire.
Through study completion, approximately 9 months
Study Arms (1)
Aqueduct 100 dilation
EXPERIMENTALUterine cervix dilation through Aqueduct-100 device
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects, females, 18 years of age or older.
- Subjects undergoing any process that requires dilation (intrauterine procedures).
- Subjects understanding the nature of the study and willing to sign informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects younger than 18 years of age.
- Subject with the following infectious diseases: HIV, HBV, HCV, Syphilis.
- Subject has been treated with any cervix dilating agent within 2 months before the screening.
- Known contraindications or hypersensitivity to the components of the investigational product.
- The patient has a condition or a concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease which could compromise participation, compliance with, and/or completion with study procedures.
- Subjects undergoing abortion \<7 and \>9 weeks of pregnancy.
- Subjects unwilling to sign the informed consent form.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aqueduct Medical Ltdlead
- Sintesi Research Srlcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Irccs Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino Ist
Genova, 16132, Italy
Related Publications (7)
Mazza E, Nava A, Bauer M, Winter R, Bajka M, Holzapfel GA. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal. 2006 Apr;10(2):125-36. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2005.06.001. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
PMID: 16143559BACKGROUNDBuhimschi, C.; Buhimschi, I.; Malinow, A.; Saade, G.; Garfield, R.; Weiner, C., The Forces of Labour. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 2003, 14 (4), 273-307.
BACKGROUNDMyers KM, Paskaleva AP, House M, Socrate S. Mechanical and biochemical properties of human cervical tissue. Acta Biomater. 2008 Jan;4(1):104-16. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
PMID: 17904431BACKGROUNDKenyon NJ, Stevens JC, Stewart P, Black MM, Clifford A. A critical investigation of the measurement of the force required to dilate the human uterine cervix. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1988 May;9(2):155-61. doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/9/2/008.
PMID: 3391017BACKGROUNDS. Febvay, S. Socrate and M.D. House. Biomechanical modeling of cervical tissue. A quantitative investigation of cervical funneling. Proceedings of the ASME 2003 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Washington, D.C., November 2003.
BACKGROUNDArsenijevic S, Vukcevic-Globarevic G, Volarevic V, Macuzic I, Todorovic P, Tanaskovic I, Mijailovic M, Raicevic S, Jeremic B. Continuous controllable balloon dilation: a novel approach for cervix dilation. Trials. 2012 Oct 22;13:196. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-196.
PMID: 23088906BACKGROUNDNicolaides KH, Welch CC, MacPherson MB, Johnson IR, Filshie GM. Lamicel: a new technique for cervical dilatation before first trimester abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 May;90(5):475-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08947.x.
PMID: 6849849BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pierluigi Venturini, Professor
IRCCS AZIENDA OSPEDALIERA UNIVERSITARIA SAN MARTINO IST
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Simone Ferrero, Professor
IRCCS AZIENDA OSPEDALIERA UNIVERSITARIA SAN MARTINO IST
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2016
First Posted
August 2, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
January 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05