NCT02952209

Brief Summary

This study is designed to assess the effects of Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) after tooth extraction compared to extraction alone in the posterior maxilla. The results of this study will demonstrate if the use of ARP reduces alveolar ridge resorption at 6 months post extraction in the posterior maxilla region.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 27, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 31, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 2, 2016

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 9, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

5.2 years

First QC Date

October 31, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 6, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Alveolar Ridge PreservationXenograft bone graftCollagen membrane

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in the bucco-palatal width of the alveolar ridge measured in mm.

    Changes in the bucco-palatal width of alveolar ridge from baseline to 6 months, measured using CBCT data.

    6 Months

  • Changes in the vertical height of the alveolar ridge measured in mm.

    Changes in the vertical height of the alveolar ridge measured using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) data and periapical radiographs.

    6 Months

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Alveolar bone volumetric changes measured in mm.

    6 Months

  • Changes in the distance from the alveolar crestal bone to the sinus floor measured in mm.

    6 months

  • Bone density changes from measured in mm.

    6 Months

  • Changes in keratinized mucosa width and thickness measured in mm.

    6 months

  • Correlation of soft tissue and buccal bone wall thickness measured in mm.

    6 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

No Treatment

NO INTERVENTION

Tooth extraction with no bone graft.

Alveolar Ridge Preservation Treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Tooth extraction followed by alveolar ridge preservation using xenograft bone graft and covered by a resorbable collagen membrane.

Device: Xenograft

Interventions

XenograftDEVICE
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
  • Subjects must be male or female who are at least 20-70 years of age.
  • Subjects must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions.
  • Presence of one posterior tooth in the right maxilla and one posterior tooth in the left maxilla that require extraction (ADA tooth positions 2-4 and 13-15). The same type of tooth should be in booth side, either two molars or two premolars.
  • Teeth extractions of one posterior tooth in the right maxilla and one posterior tooth in the left maxilla must be completed successfully (ADA tooth positions 2-4 and 13-15).
  • If present, teeth adjacent to the teeth slated for extraction must be healthy. Healthy teeth are defined as asymptomatic teeth without periapical lesions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or who intend to become pregnant during the study period following entrance into the study.
  • Subjects who have failed to maintain good plaque control.
  • Subjects with any systemic condition such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, cancer, HIV, disorders that compromise wound healing, chronic high dose steroid therapy, intravenous and oral bisphosphonate therapy, bone metabolic diseases, history of irradiation of the head and neck area, or any other immuno-suppressive therapy that would contraindicate oral surgical treatment.
  • Subjects who report allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the products (collagen membrane and ABBM) used throughout the study.
  • Presence of ≥3 mm of vertical loss of the buccal bone in relation to the palatal wall.
  • Subjects with untreated periodontitis.
  • Presence of acute dentoalveolar infections in the teeth slated for extraction.
  • Subjects who are heavy smokers (defined as \>10 cigarettes per day or \>1 cigar per day) or chew tobacco, including within 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • Subjects with conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non- compliance or unreliability

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bluestone Center for Clinical Research

New York, New York, 10010, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Araujo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Dynamics of Bio-Oss Collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):55-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01854.x.

    PMID: 20070748BACKGROUND
  • Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Socket grafting with the use of autologous bone: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):9-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01937.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

    PMID: 21091539BACKGROUND
  • Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Apr;14(2):137-43. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.x.

    PMID: 12656871BACKGROUND
  • Ashman A. Postextraction ridge preservation using a synthetic alloplast. Implant Dent. 2000;9(2):168-76. doi: 10.1097/00008505-200009020-00011.

    PMID: 11307396BACKGROUND
  • Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, Duncan W, Faggion CM, Esposito M. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 28;2015(5):CD010176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010176.pub2.

    PMID: 26020735BACKGROUND
  • Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):950-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034514541127. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

    PMID: 24966231BACKGROUND
  • Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M, Jancovic S, Orsini M. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 Nov;90(5):581-6. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.110035.

    PMID: 11077380BACKGROUND
  • Greenstein G, Jaffin RA, Hilsen KL, Berman CL. Repair of anterior gingival deformity with durapatite. A case report. J Periodontol. 1985 Apr;56(4):200-3. doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.4.200.

    PMID: 2987474BACKGROUND
  • Norton MR, Wilson J. Dental implants placed in extraction sites implanted with bioactive glass: human histology and clinical outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Mar-Apr;17(2):249-57.

    PMID: 11958408BACKGROUND
  • Rasperini G, Canullo L, Dellavia C, Pellegrini G, Simion M. Socket grafting in the posterior maxilla reduces the need for sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Jun;30(3):265-73.

    PMID: 20386783BACKGROUND
  • Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.

    PMID: 12956475BACKGROUND
  • Soehren SE, Van Swol RL. The healing extraction site: a donor area for periodontal grafting material. J Periodontol. 1979 Mar;50(3):128-33. doi: 10.1902/jop.1979.50.3.128.

    PMID: 285263BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Transplantation, Heterologous

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TransplantationSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Ismael E. Khouly, DDS, MS, PhD

    Bluestone Center for Clinical Research

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Director of Periodontology & Implant Dentistry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2016

First Posted

November 2, 2016

Study Start

September 27, 2016

Primary Completion

December 1, 2021

Study Completion

December 1, 2021

Last Updated

March 9, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations