Evaluating the Effectiveness of Incentive Spirometry
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) have a major impact on patients and healthcare expenses. The goal of perioperative respiratory therapy is to improve airway clearance, increase lung volume, and mitigate atelectasis. Incentive spirometers (IS) are ubiquitously used to prevent atelectasis and PPCs-implementation of which requires substantial provider time and healthcare expenses. However, meta-analyses have demonstrated that the effectiveness of ISs is unclear due to poor patient compliance in past studies. The goal of this investigation is evaluate the effectiveness of IS on post-operative clinical outcomes. The aims of this investigation are to evaluate 1) if IS use compliance can be improved by adding a use-recording patient reminder alarm, and 2) the clinical outcomes of the more compliant IS users vs. the less-compliant IS users.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 18, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 2, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 7, 2018
August 1, 2018
1.4 years
October 18, 2016
August 6, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compliance - Does the alarm improve IS use compliance?
The primary outcome will be to compare subjects' absolute IS usage count and hourly percent compliance in the Bell On arm vs the Bell Off arms.
up to 1 week postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Outcomes - Does IS use compliance improve clinical outcomes?
up to 1 week postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Bell On
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in the Bell On arm will receive a timer where the alarm will sound every hour.
Bell Off
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects in the Bell Off arm will receive a timer where the alarm will not sound, but still record incentive spirometer usage
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergoes any cardiothoracic surgery
- Is transferred to the cardiothoracic surgery intermediate (step-down) unit at Rhode Island Hospital
- Already prescribed an incentive spirometer as standard-of-care
- Followed by any healthcare provider
- Ability to sign informed consent and comply with all study procedures including follow-up for up to 1 year
You may not qualify if:
- \<18 years of age
- Vulnerable population who in the judgment of the investigator is unable to give Informed Consent for reasons of incapacity, immaturity, adverse personal circumstances or lack of autonomy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lifespanlead
Study Sites (1)
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Related Publications (12)
Freitas ER, Soares BG, Cardoso JR, Atallah AN. Incentive spirometry for preventing pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass graft. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD004466. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004466.pub3.
PMID: 22972072BACKGROUNDdo Nascimento Junior P, Modolo NS, Andrade S, Guimaraes MM, Braz LG, El Dib R. Incentive spirometry for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications in upper abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 8;2014(2):CD006058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006058.pub3.
PMID: 24510642BACKGROUNDNarayanan AL, Hamid SR, Supriyanto E. Evidence regarding patient compliance with incentive spirometry interventions after cardiac, thoracic and abdominal surgeries: A systematic literature review. Can J Respir Ther. 2016 Winter;52(1):17-26.
PMID: 26909010BACKGROUNDJoyce CJ, Baker AB. What is the role of absorption atelectasis in the genesis of perioperative pulmonary collapse? Anaesth Intensive Care. 1995 Dec;23(6):691-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9502300606.
PMID: 8669602BACKGROUNDQaseem A, Snow V, Fitterman N, Hornbake ER, Lawrence VA, Smetana GW, Weiss K, Owens DK, Aronson M, Barry P, Casey DE Jr, Cross JT Jr, Fitterman N, Sherif KD, Weiss KB; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):575-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00008.
PMID: 16618955BACKGROUNDCanet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Valles J, Castillo J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1338-50. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc6e0a.
PMID: 21045639BACKGROUNDEphgrave KS, Kleiman-Wexler R, Pfaller M, Booth B, Werkmeister L, Young S. Postoperative pneumonia: a prospective study of risk factors and morbidity. Surgery. 1993 Oct;114(4):815-9; discussion 819-21.
PMID: 8211699BACKGROUNDShander A, Fleisher LA, Barie PS, Bigatello LM, Sladen RN, Watson CB. Clinical and economic burden of postoperative pulmonary complications: patient safety summit on definition, risk-reducing interventions, and preventive strategies. Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):2163-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821f0522.
PMID: 21572323BACKGROUNDKhan NA, Quan H, Bugar JM, Lemaire JB, Brant R, Ghali WA. Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care center. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21(2):177-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00319.x.
PMID: 16606377BACKGROUNDAgostini P, Singh S. Incentive spirometry following thoracic surgery: what should we be doing? Physiotherapy. 2009 Jun;95(2):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2008.11.003. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
PMID: 19627688BACKGROUNDRestrepo RD, Wettstein R, Wittnebel L, Tracy M. Incentive spirometry: 2011. Respir Care. 2011 Oct;56(10):1600-4. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01471.
PMID: 22008401BACKGROUNDEltorai AEM, Baird GL, Eltorai AS, Healey TT, Agarwal S, Ventetuolo CE, Martin TJ, Chen J, Kazemi L, Keable CA, Diaz E, Pangborn J, Fox J, Connors K, Sellke FW, Elias JA, Daniels AH. Effect of an Incentive Spirometer Patient Reminder After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):579-588. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0520.
PMID: 30969332DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 18, 2016
First Posted
November 2, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08