Study Stopped
slow enrollment, outdated material
Evaluation of a Disposable Flexible Bronchoscope, aScope IV
EVAL
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Flexible bronchoscopes are typically reusable and therefore need high level disinfection to prevent inadvertent spread of microbial pathogens from patient to patient. The process of disinfection is time consuming and expensive. Moreover, a bronchoscope being processed may not be readily available for another patient. One solution to this problem was to use a single use disposable sheath that covers a flexible bronchoscope protecting all surfaces of the bronchoscope.(Colt, Beamis, Harrell, \& Mathur, 2000). Another way to eliminate potential hazards with a reusable bronchoscope is the use of a disposable bronchoscope. Such a disposable bronchoscope has been developed (Ambu aScope, Ambu, Glen Burnie, MD) and has been used successfully for intubations in manikins(Scutt et al., 2011) and patients. (Kristensen \& Fredensborg, 2013; Pujol, López, \& Valero, 2010; Tvede, Kristensen, \& Nyhus-Andreasen, 2012). Further advancement in the imaging and handling of this disposable flexible bronchoscope now allows for the purpose of bronchoscopy and broncho-alveolar lavage in critically ill patients with pulmonary compromise. (FDA approval: 05-11-2013 date) The aim of the study is to compare image clarity, suction capacity, and handling performance of a reusable flexible bronchoscope to the disposable flexible bronchoscope. In addition, the investigators intend to perform a cost analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 14, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 26, 2022
CompletedApril 26, 2022
April 1, 2022
4.8 years
September 24, 2014
July 16, 2021
April 25, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of Visualization of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes; a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope
Visualization of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as "cannot be evaluated" and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization
10 to 30 minutes
Evaluation of the Handling of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope
Handling of the two bronchoscopes using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as "cannot be evaluated" and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization
10-30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of Ability to Suction With Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope
10-30 minutes
Evaluation of Flexibility of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope
10-30 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Disposable bronchoscope first (aScope IV), then Reusable bronchoscope (Storz 8402 2x)
EXPERIMENTALthe bronchoscope will be re-inserted and advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope will be brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml will be administered. The flow of saline will be observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction will be applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step will be repeated 4 more times (total of 80ml) to obtain an adequate specimen.
Reusable bronchoscope first (Storz 8402 2x), then Disposable bronchoscope (aScope IV)
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe bronchoscope will be re-inserted and advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope will be brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml will be administered. The flow of saline will be observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction will be applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step will be repeated 4 more times (total of 80ml) to obtain an adequate specimen.
Interventions
Bronchoscopy and alveolar lavage
Bronchoscopy and alveolar lavage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult 18 years old and older
- Capable of giving informed consent or have an acceptable surrogate capable of giving legally authorized consent on the subject's behalf.
- Indication of a diagnostic and or therapeutic bronchoscopy as determined by the attending critical care physician
- Being cared for in the critical care units at the U of L Hospital
You may not qualify if:
- \) Patient is moribund and a bronchoscopy is very unlikely to reduce impending mortality or can avert death
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Louisville School of Medicine
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Related Publications (19)
Bellomo R, Tai E, Parkin G. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the critically ill: a prospective study of its diagnostic and therapeutic value. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1992 Nov;20(4):464-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9202000412.
PMID: 1463174BACKGROUNDColt HG, Beamis JJ, Harrell JH, Mathur PM. Novel flexible bronchoscope and single-use disposable-sheath endoscope system. A preliminary technology evaluation. Chest. 2000 Jul;118(1):183-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.183.
PMID: 10893377BACKGROUNDEstella A. [Analysis of 208 flexible bronchoscopies performed in an intensive care unit]. Med Intensiva. 2012 Aug-Sep;36(6):396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Dec 20. Spanish.
PMID: 22192316BACKGROUNDFacciolongo N, Patelli M, Gasparini S, Lazzari Agli L, Salio M, Simonassi C, Del Prato B, Zanoni P. Incidence of complications in bronchoscopy. Multicentre prospective study of 20,986 bronchoscopies. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2009 Mar;71(1):8-14. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2009.370.
PMID: 19522159BACKGROUNDGeorgiades G, Myrianthefs P, Venetsanou K, Kythreoti A, Kyroudi A, Kittas C, Baltopoulos G. Temperature and serum proinflammatory cytokine changes in patients with NSCLC after BAL. Lung. 2003;181(1):35-47. doi: 10.1007/s00408-003-1001-6.
PMID: 12879338BACKGROUNDHuang YC, Bassett MA, Levin D, Montilla T, Ghio AJ. Acute phase reaction in healthy volunteers after bronchoscopy with lavage. Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1565-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1565.
PMID: 16778276BACKGROUNDIkeda S, Yanai N, Ishikawa S. Flexible bronchofiberscope. Keio J Med. 1968 Mar;17(1):1-16. doi: 10.2302/kjm.17.1. No abstract available.
PMID: 5674435BACKGROUNDKreider ME, Lipson DA. Bronchoscopy for atelectasis in the ICU: a case report and review of the literature. Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):344-50. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.344.
PMID: 12853543BACKGROUNDKristensen MS, Fredensborg BB. The disposable Ambu aScope vs. a conventional flexible videoscope for awake intubation -- a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Aug;57(7):888-95. doi: 10.1111/aas.12094. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
PMID: 23495767BACKGROUNDLucena CM, Martinez-Olondris P, Badia JR, Xaubet A, Ferrer M, Torres A, Agusti C. [Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a respiratory intensive care unit]. Med Intensiva. 2012 Aug-Sep;36(6):389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 22. Spanish.
PMID: 22195599BACKGROUNDPerkins GD, Chatterjie S, McAuley DF, Gao F, Thickett DR. Role of nonbronchoscopic lavage for investigating alveolar inflammation and permeability in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):57-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000190197.69945.c5.
PMID: 16374157BACKGROUNDPujol E, Lopez AM, Valero R. Use of the Ambu((R)) aScope in 10 patients with predicted difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010 Oct;65(10):1037-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06477.x.
PMID: 20707786BACKGROUNDDu Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, Chaudhuri N, Gupta V, Khalid S, Mandal S, Martin J, Mills J, Navani N, Rahman NM, Wrightson JM, Munavvar M; British Thoracic Society Bronchoscopy Guideline Group. Summary of the British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults. Thorax. 2013 Aug;68(8):786-7. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203629.
PMID: 23842821BACKGROUNDScutt S, Clark N, Cook TM, Smith C, Christmas T, Coppel L, Crewdson K. Evaluation of a single-use intubating videoscope (Ambu aScope ) in three airway training manikins for oral intubation, nasal intubation and intubation via three supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia. 2011 Apr;66(4):293-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06647.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
PMID: 21401543BACKGROUNDSharif-Kashani B, Shahabi P, Behzadnia N, Mohammad-Taheri Z, Mansouri D, Masjedi MR, Zargari L, Salimi Negad L. Incidence of fever and bacteriemia following flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a prospective study. Acta Med Iran. 2010 Nov-Dec;48(6):385-8.
PMID: 21287478BACKGROUNDSteinberg KP, Mitchell DR, Maunder RJ, Milberg JA, Whitcomb ME, Hudson LD. Safety of bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Sep;148(3):556-61. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.556.
PMID: 8368623BACKGROUNDTsao TC, Tsai YH, Lan RS, Shieh WB, Lee CH. Treatment for collapsed lung in critically ill patients. Selective intrabronchial air insufflation using the fiberoptic bronchoscope. Chest. 1990 Feb;97(2):435-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.2.435.
PMID: 2298070BACKGROUNDTvede MF, Kristensen MS, Nyhus-Andreasen M. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 May;56(5):577-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02653.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
PMID: 22338623BACKGROUNDUm SW, Choi CM, Lee CT, Kim YW, Han SK, Shim YS, Yoo CG. Prospective analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors of postbronchoscopy fever. Chest. 2004 Mar;125(3):945-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.3.945.
PMID: 15006953BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Rainer Lenhardt
- Organization
- University of Louisville
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rainer Lenhardt, MD MBA
University of Louisville School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- A blinded investigator will view the bronchoscopy video and evaluate. The blinded investigator will use the same criteria the investigator who did the procedure used (Un-blinded) for the evaluation. Video will not indicate which scope was used and only indicate if it is the right or left lung they are viewing. Research coordinator will keep separate a file indicating which scope was used.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, MBA
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 24, 2014
First Posted
October 3, 2014
Study Start
April 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 14, 2020
Study Completion
January 14, 2020
Last Updated
April 26, 2022
Results First Posted
April 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share