NCT02951351

Brief Summary

The specific aims of this study are to compare patient experience with and without a proparacaine drop after povidone iodine.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 12, 2016

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 29, 2016

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 1, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 25, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

April 12, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

October 29, 2016

Results QC Date

April 1, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 11, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of Study Participants With Positive Conjunctival Culture

    Conjunctival samples were collected after participants received either an additional drop of proparacaine or povidone iodine. Bacterial cultures were performed from conjunctival samples by the Mayo Clinic Microbiology laboratory. Bacterial species identification was performed on any and all bacteria that grew.

    pre-injection

  • Pain at the Time of Injection

    Subjects were asked to complete a survey about their experience with intravitreal injections after the procedure was completed. The survey was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a positive response and 10 was a negative response. The lower the score, the lesser the perceived pain, the higher the score, the higher the perceived pain.

    post-injection

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Residual Pain From Intravitreal Injection

    post-injection

  • Overall Impression of Visit for Intravitreal Injection

    post-injection

  • Impression of Pre-injection Preparations

    post-injection

  • Comfort With Intravitreal Injection Standard Procedure

    post-injection

  • Expectation Intravitreal Injection Will Have Negative Consequences on Subject Health

    post-injection

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Standard procedure + Culture

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will undergo the standard injection protocol. A conjunctival culture will then be obtained followed by the application of povidone-iodine to the eyelashes and eyelid margins. Patients will be randomized to receive 5% povidone-iodine drop to the conjunctival surface followed by conjunctival culture then re-application of 5% povidone-iodine drop to the conjunctival surface. Injection will then proceed.

Procedure: Conjunctival culture

Proparacaine + Culture

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will undergo the standard injection protocol. A conjunctival culture will then be obtained followed by the application of povidone-iodine to the eyelashes and eyelid margins. Patients will undergo application of another drop of topical anesthetic followed by conjunctival culture. After the culture, this group of patients will have 5% povidone iodine applied to the conjunctival surface. Intravitreal injection will then proceed.

Drug: ProparacaineProcedure: Conjunctival culture

Interventions

Extra proparacaine will be applied to the conjunctival surface to determine its role in patient experience.

Also known as: alcaine
Proparacaine + Culture

Conjunctival cultures will be performed to ensure that the intervention does not interfere with antisepsis.

Proparacaine + CultureStandard procedure + Culture

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients undergoing intravitreal injection who do not have active eye infections
  • greater than 18 years of age

You may not qualify if:

  • patients younger than 18 years of age
  • patients with active eye infections

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55901, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Isenberg SJ, Apt L, Yoshimori R, Khwarg S. Chemical preparation of the eye in ophthalmic surgery. IV. Comparison of povidone-iodine on the conjunctiva with a prophylactic antibiotic. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Sep;103(9):1340-2. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050090092039.

    PMID: 2994609BACKGROUND
  • Apt L, Isenberg S, Yoshimori R, Paez JH. Chemical preparation of the eye in ophthalmic surgery. III. Effect of povidone-iodine on the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 May;102(5):728-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030584025.

    PMID: 6721765BACKGROUND
  • Oguz H, Oguz E, Karadede S, Aslan G. The antibacterial effect of topical anesthetic proparacaine on conjunctival flora. Int Ophthalmol. 1999;23(2):117-20. doi: 10.1023/a:1026567912389.

    PMID: 11196120BACKGROUND
  • van Asten F, van Middendorp H, Verkerk S, Breukink MB, Lomme RM, Hoyng CB, Evers AW, Klevering BJ. ARE INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS WITH ULTRATHIN 33-G NEEDLES LESS PAINFUL THAN THE COMMONLY USED 30-G NEEDLES? Retina. 2015 Sep;35(9):1778-85. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000550.

    PMID: 25901838BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Macular DegenerationPain, Postoperative

Interventions

proxymetacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesEye DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Margaret M. Reynolds, MD
Organization
Mayo Clinic

Study Officials

  • Jose S Pulido, MD

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2016

First Posted

November 1, 2016

Study Start

October 12, 2016

Primary Completion

February 1, 2018

Study Completion

February 1, 2018

Last Updated

April 12, 2023

Results First Posted

June 25, 2019

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations