Topical Proparacaine Eye Drops to Improve the Experience of Patients Undergoing Intravitreal Injections
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The specific aims of this study are to compare patient experience with and without a proparacaine drop after povidone iodine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 12, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 25, 2019
CompletedApril 12, 2023
April 1, 2023
1.3 years
October 29, 2016
April 1, 2019
April 11, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Study Participants With Positive Conjunctival Culture
Conjunctival samples were collected after participants received either an additional drop of proparacaine or povidone iodine. Bacterial cultures were performed from conjunctival samples by the Mayo Clinic Microbiology laboratory. Bacterial species identification was performed on any and all bacteria that grew.
pre-injection
Pain at the Time of Injection
Subjects were asked to complete a survey about their experience with intravitreal injections after the procedure was completed. The survey was scored on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) where 0 was a positive response and 10 was a negative response. The lower the score, the lesser the perceived pain, the higher the score, the higher the perceived pain.
post-injection
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Residual Pain From Intravitreal Injection
post-injection
Overall Impression of Visit for Intravitreal Injection
post-injection
Impression of Pre-injection Preparations
post-injection
Comfort With Intravitreal Injection Standard Procedure
post-injection
Expectation Intravitreal Injection Will Have Negative Consequences on Subject Health
post-injection
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard procedure + Culture
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will undergo the standard injection protocol. A conjunctival culture will then be obtained followed by the application of povidone-iodine to the eyelashes and eyelid margins. Patients will be randomized to receive 5% povidone-iodine drop to the conjunctival surface followed by conjunctival culture then re-application of 5% povidone-iodine drop to the conjunctival surface. Injection will then proceed.
Proparacaine + Culture
EXPERIMENTALPatients will undergo the standard injection protocol. A conjunctival culture will then be obtained followed by the application of povidone-iodine to the eyelashes and eyelid margins. Patients will undergo application of another drop of topical anesthetic followed by conjunctival culture. After the culture, this group of patients will have 5% povidone iodine applied to the conjunctival surface. Intravitreal injection will then proceed.
Interventions
Extra proparacaine will be applied to the conjunctival surface to determine its role in patient experience.
Conjunctival cultures will be performed to ensure that the intervention does not interfere with antisepsis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients undergoing intravitreal injection who do not have active eye infections
- greater than 18 years of age
You may not qualify if:
- patients younger than 18 years of age
- patients with active eye infections
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- VitreoRetinal Surgery, PAcollaborator
- Research to Prevent Blindnesscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55901, United States
Related Publications (4)
Isenberg SJ, Apt L, Yoshimori R, Khwarg S. Chemical preparation of the eye in ophthalmic surgery. IV. Comparison of povidone-iodine on the conjunctiva with a prophylactic antibiotic. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Sep;103(9):1340-2. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050090092039.
PMID: 2994609BACKGROUNDApt L, Isenberg S, Yoshimori R, Paez JH. Chemical preparation of the eye in ophthalmic surgery. III. Effect of povidone-iodine on the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 May;102(5):728-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030584025.
PMID: 6721765BACKGROUNDOguz H, Oguz E, Karadede S, Aslan G. The antibacterial effect of topical anesthetic proparacaine on conjunctival flora. Int Ophthalmol. 1999;23(2):117-20. doi: 10.1023/a:1026567912389.
PMID: 11196120BACKGROUNDvan Asten F, van Middendorp H, Verkerk S, Breukink MB, Lomme RM, Hoyng CB, Evers AW, Klevering BJ. ARE INTRAVITREAL INJECTIONS WITH ULTRATHIN 33-G NEEDLES LESS PAINFUL THAN THE COMMONLY USED 30-G NEEDLES? Retina. 2015 Sep;35(9):1778-85. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000550.
PMID: 25901838BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Margaret M. Reynolds, MD
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jose S Pulido, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2016
First Posted
November 1, 2016
Study Start
October 12, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 12, 2023
Results First Posted
June 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2023-04