(PEEK) Housing Verses Metallic Housing of Ball and Socket Attachment on Retention of Mandibular Overdenture
Effect of Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Housing Verses Metallic Housing of Ball and Socket Attachment on Retention of Mandibular Implant Retained Overdentures: Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effect of PEEK housing vs. metal housing in terms of retention and patient satisfaction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedNovember 1, 2016
October 1, 2016
1.2 years
October 25, 2016
October 31, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Retention of implant supported overdenture by using digital force meter device
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Metal housing
ACTIVE COMPARATORmetal housing of ball and socket attachment the intervention will be overdenture
Peek housing
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeek housing of ball and socket attachment the intervention will be overdenture
Interventions
Active comparator will be metal housing and peek housing
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient should be free from any systemic disease that may interfere with dental implants placement and/or osseointegration e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, blood diseases, bone diseases, smoking.etc.
- Patients have completely edentulous upper and lower arches.
- Patients have healthy mucosa free from any ulceration, inflammation or infections.
- All patients are free from neuromuscular and temporomandibular joint disorders.
- Selected patients have normal maxillo-mandibular relationship (Angle class I ridge classification) with adequate inter-arch space and normal tongue size.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with limited manual dexterity.
- Patients with Xerostomia, excessive salivation or pathological mucosal changes (e.g. Lichen planus, Leukoplakia…etc.)
- Pregnant females.
- Un co-operative patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2016
First Posted
November 1, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
November 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10