Patient Satisfaction and Prosthetic Complications of Bar Locator Versus Bar Clip Attachments for Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: This study evaluated patient satisfaction and oral health-related- quality of life (OHRQoL) with implant overdentures retained with bar locator versus bar clip attachment for mandibular two-implant overdentures. Materials and methods: This study included sixteen edentulous patients. Every patient received new maxillary and mandibular dentures. Two dental implants have been embedded in the mandibular canine areas. The participants were randomly divided into two equal groups: Group I (bar locator): Patients were given overdentures with bar locator attachments, Group II (bar clip): Patients were given overdentures with bar clip attachment. Patient satisfaction (primary outcome) was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS). OHRQoL (secondary outcome) was measured by oral health impact profile (OHIP-14). Questions of VAS and OHIP-14 were evaluated after 3 months. The aim of this study was to document and report on the prosthetic complications associated with mandibular implant overdentures using bar locator and bar clip attachments. The study aimed to test the null hypothesis that the complications would not differ based on the type of retention (locator or clip).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2024
CompletedNovember 4, 2024
November 1, 2024
1.1 years
October 31, 2024
November 1, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient Satisfaction
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction (primary outcome) was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS). OHRQoL (secondary outcome) was measured by oral health impact profile (OHIP-14). Questions of VAS and OHIP-14 were evaluated after 3 months.
prosthetic complications
Mechanical complications were clinically examined and included Distortion /wear of retentive components, Bar screw loosening, Fracture of opposing prosthesis, Teeth wear, Fracture at the midline of the prosthesis and Teeth separation within 5 years
Study Arms (2)
Group I (bar locator): Patients were given overdentures with bar locator attachments
EXPERIMENTALGroup I received mandibular overdentures with a bar locator attachment , specially designed milled bar with parallel walls was built for this group, and two holes were drilled in the top surface of the bar using a 1.7 mm bar drill to create the threaded site in the waxed bar, followed by a 2.0 mm bar tap. The locator female component was then connected to the corresponding site using a customised rider.
group2, Patients were given overdentures with bar clip attachment.
EXPERIMENTALbar clip attachment. Patients received mandibular overdentures with bar clip attachments. A plastic prefabricated bar was cast in cobalt-chrome alloy. Group II patients received mandibular overdentures with bar clip attachments. A plastic prefabricated bar was cast in cobalt-chrome alloy.
Interventions
Patient satisfaction (primary outcome) was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS). OHRQoL (secondary outcome) was measured by oral health impact profile (OHIP-14). Questions of VAS and OHIP-14 were evaluated after 3 months The patients were divided into two equal groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Each patient had sufficient remaining alveolar ridge in the upper and lower jaw to support implants in the lower jaw area
- a minimum length of 11 mm and a diameter of 3.7 mm, as confirmed by cone beam computed tomography.
- patient had a class I jaw relationship
- adequate space between the arches.
- healthy, firm gum tissue.
You may not qualify if:
- participants with uncontrolled diabetes,
- heavy smoking
- drinking habits
- temporomandibular joint (TMJ) issues.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Heba Wageh Abozaed
Al Mansurah, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2024
First Posted
November 4, 2024
Study Start
November 12, 2022
Primary Completion
January 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2024
Last Updated
November 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11