Evidence-based Laboratory Test Order Sets in Primary Care
The Effect of Evidence-based Order Sets Within a CPOE System on the Quantity and Quality of Laboratory Test Ordering in Family Practice: a Cluster Randomised Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
288
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate what the effect is of evidence-based order sets aimed at five indications on the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus
Started Dec 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2019
CompletedJanuary 23, 2020
January 1, 2020
6 months
October 25, 2016
January 17, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Appropriateness
number of appropriate tests for 17 study indications
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Missed or delayed diagnoses
1 year
Laboratory test volume
1 year
Other Outcomes (1)
Downstream or cascade clinical activities
1 year
Study Arms (2)
CPOE with order sets
EXPERIMENTALPhysicians who use CPOE including order sets for large range of indications.
CPOE without order sets
ACTIVE COMPARATORPhysicians who use CPOE without order sets.
Interventions
CPOE including series of recommended tests ordered per indication
CPOE only
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary care practices will be considered eligible if all the physicians active in the practice agree to be involved in the study
- All family physicians will be considered eligible if they:
- Collaborate with either MCH, Anacura or AML for their laboratory test orders
- Agree to use the online CPOE for their laboratory test orders
- Use a computerized EHR for patient care
- Agree to the terms in the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Primary care practices where one or more physicians refuse to be enrolled will be excluded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuvenlead
- KU Leuvencollaborator
- University Ghentcollaborator
- Norwegian Institute of Public Healthcollaborator
- Sciensanocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Academic Centre for General Practice
Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
Related Publications (3)
Delvaux N, De Sutter A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Fieuws S, Aertgeerts B. Electronic Laboratory Medicine ordering with evidence-based Order sets in primary care (ELMO study): protocol for a cluster randomised trial. Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 6;12(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0685-6.
PMID: 29212546BACKGROUNDPiessens V, Delvaux N, Heytens S, Aertgeerts B, De Sutter A. Downstream activities after laboratory testing in primary care: an exploratory outcome of the ELMO cluster randomised trial (Electronic Laboratory Medicine Ordering with evidence-based order sets in primary care). BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e059261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059261.
PMID: 35379642DERIVEDDelvaux N, Piessens V, Burghgraeve T, Mamouris P, Vaes B, Stichele RV, Cloetens H, Thomas J, Ramaekers D, Sutter A, Aertgeerts B. Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2020 Nov 4;15(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01059-y.
PMID: 33148311DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 25, 2016
First Posted
October 31, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
August 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 23, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD sharing plan not yet decided. Decision will be made upon start of trial.