NCT02949674

Brief Summary

Title: Ropivacaine versus Bupivacaine as Preventive Analgesia in Surgical Incision Site In Patients With Ankle Fracture Background: Ankle fractures are about 10% of the fractures associate to sports and with an incidence of 0.11 of 1000 adult patients. Weber classification system divides ankle fractures in three types according to the anatomy of lateral malleolus. B fractures starts at tibia pilon. Stable fractures are easily treated in conservative way. (12) Unstable fractures are treated surgically with anatomic reduction and internal fixation. However, it's been reported that even with successful reduction surgically great results are not always achieved. Local wound infiltration blocks the pain in its origin, surgical site by itself, without alter motor function. Practically without presenting adverse events with this method. it´s accurate for ambulatory surgery. Main Objetive: To compare preventive analgesia with local anesthetic in surgical site with ropivacaine or bupivacaine in ankle fracture patients treated surgically with open reduction and internal fixation. Method: Two groups with ankle fractures which will be informed and the patients will sign informed consent, after that the patients will be assign to a group (Ropivacaine or bupivacaine). The patient will be prepared for surgical treatment according to his doctor. It will be applied traditional anesthesia. It will be applied before beginning surgery in bupivacaine group 25 mg and in ropivacaine group 37.5 mg at least 10 minutes before starting surgery. After that the patient will have the traditional dose of analgesic treatment.The group will evaluate the pain with VAS 0-10 at 4,8,12 and 24 hours after surgery. The group will register data and will make statistic analysis. It will be elaborated the conclusion an elaboration of a report. Resources: The group counts with human resources of the group of investigators. The hospital has in emergency department almost three patients with ankle fractures each day which require surgical treatment. The hospital has x ray service to valuate the ankle fracture and with computer system to analyze it. The hospital has the software for statistical analysis. Experience: The group is formed with orthopedic surgeons with more than 5 years in treatment of ankle fractures. Investigators have the support of pain medicine group in hospital and with anesthesia coordinators. Investigators have a group of orthopedic residents which will be encharged of ilfiltration wound site. Time: September 2016 to February 2017.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
93

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2016

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 25, 2016

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 31, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2017

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 31, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

December 31, 2018

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

October 25, 2016

Results QC Date

September 16, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • VAS

    The Pain will be measured with this scale from 0 (No pain) -10 (Worst pain possible) according to the investigator at 24 hours after surgery.

    Change in Visual Analogue Scale at 24 hours

Study Arms (3)

Bupivacaine

EXPERIMENTAL

It will be used bupivacaine in surgical site prior surgery (25 mg). At least 10 minutes before skin incision.

Drug: Bupivacaine

Ropivacaine

EXPERIMENTAL

It will be used ropivacaine in surgical site prior surgery (37.5 mg). At least 10 minutes before skin incision.

Drug: Ropivacaine

Control

NO INTERVENTION

No application of anesthetic

Interventions

It will be used as a analgesic dose in surgical site before surgery.

Also known as: Naropin
Ropivacaine

It will be used as a analgesic dose in surgical site before surgery.

Also known as: Bupivacaine hydrochloride
Bupivacaine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with afiliation to IMSS
  • Patient with ankle fracture that requires surgical treatment with open reduction and internal fixation
  • Patient that accept to participate in the study whit a sign of document.

You may not qualify if:

  • Politrauma patients (Patients with another fracture)
  • Patients who dont accept to participate in the study
  • Neuropathy in inferior limps that limits pain perception
  • Open ankle fractures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UMAE Dr. Victorio de La Fuente Narvaez

Mexico City, 07020, Mexico

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ankle FracturesPain, Postoperative

Interventions

RopivacaineBupivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesAnkle InjuriesLeg InjuriesPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Limitations and Caveats

We consider that we can had a better result with higher dosis of local anesthetic, and the comparation with a placebo group would be a better analysis.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Juan Lopez
Organization
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Study Officials

  • Juan Jonathan De La Cruz Pacheco

    IMSS

    STUDY CHAIR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2016

First Posted

October 31, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

October 1, 2016

Study Completion

April 1, 2017

Last Updated

December 31, 2018

Results First Posted

December 31, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations