Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Limb Surgery
A Randomised, Double-Blind, Multi-Centre, Parallel Group Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of 5 mg/ml Ropivacaine and 5 mg/ml Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Lower Limb Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, duration of motor block until return to normal function in the non-operated leg after the start of injection, of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml when used for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Apr 2006
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2006
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2006
CompletedMarch 26, 2009
March 1, 2009
July 28, 2006
March 25, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the efficacy, duration of motor block until return to normal function in the non-operated leg after the start of injection, of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml when used for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing unilateral lower
Secondary Outcomes (5)
To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in the duration of sensory block at dermatome T10 level
To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in the onset time of sensory block and motor block respectively
To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in the quality of anaesthesia
To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in subject pain during surgery
To determine the safety of ropivacaine 5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5 mg/ml by evaluating the incidence and severity of adverse events, blood pressure, pulse rate and blood loss
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Provision of written informed consent
- Men or women, 18 years £ age £ 70 years
- Patient scheduled for unilateral lower limb surgery with an estimated duration \< 2 hours under spinal anaesthesia
- ASA category I \~ II
- ≤ BMI ≤ 23.9
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to spinal anaesthesia, such as local infections, generalised septicaemia, platelet and clotting factor abnormalities, significant neurological disease with motor or sensory deficit, diagnosed increased intracranial pressure
- A known history of allergy, sensitivity or any other form of reaction to local anaesthetics of amide type
- Suspected inability to comply with the study procedures, including language difficulties or medical history and/or concomitant disease, as judged by the investigator
- Psychiatric history or any other concomitant disease which may lead to unreliability in clinical assessments, as judged by the investigator
- Significant alcohol, drug or medication abuse, as judged by the investigator
- Women who are pregnant or lactating or women of child bearing potential who are not practising adequate contraception or have positive urine pregnancy test (a urine Human chorionic gonadotropin \[HCG\] analysis)
- Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study (applies to both AstraZeneca staff or staff at the study site)
- Previous enrolment in the present study
- Participation in a clinical study during the last 3 months
- Serious or unstable medical or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the subjects' safety or successful participation in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- AstraZenecalead
Study Sites (5)
Research Site
Beijing, China
Research Site
Guangzhou, China
Research Site
Shanghai, China
Research Site
Shenyang, China
Research Site
Xi'an, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
AstraZeneca China Medical Director, MD
AstraZeneca
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2006
First Posted
July 31, 2006
Study Start
April 1, 2006
Study Completion
September 1, 2006
Last Updated
March 26, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-03