The WISE Trial - Walking Improvement for SCI With Exoskeleton
WISE
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
10
Brief Summary
A randomized, controlled trial comparing exoskeleton gait training with standard gait training or no gait training in community-dwelling participants with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 31, 2023
CompletedOctober 31, 2023
October 1, 2023
3 years
September 27, 2016
March 29, 2023
October 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Gait Speed From Baseline to 12 Weeks Using 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
The mean change in gait speed demonstrated during the 10MWT after 12 weeks of training and compared between groups. Positive values indicate improvement in gait speed (faster) from baseline to 12 weeks. Negative values indicate a reduction in gait speed (slower) from baseline to 12 weeks.
Baseline and 12 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Number of Participants Who Met the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of 0.15m/s in Gait Speed Per 10 Meter Walk Test (10MWT) From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Between baseline and 24 weeks
Change in Distance Covered Over 6 Minutes From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Baseline-24 weeks
Change in Time Required to Complete Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test From Baseline to 24 Week Follow up
Baseline and 24 weeks
Number of Participants Who Experienced a Fall During Protocol
Throughout 24 weeks
Change in Berg Balance Scale Score From Baseline to 24 Weeks
Baseline-24 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Group 1: Ekso GT Rehabilitation Therapy
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group receive Ekso GT (gait training) PT therapy intervention 3 times per week for 12 weeks (36 sessions). Intervention: Ekso GT Rehabilitation therapy
Group 2: Active controls - BWSTT Therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this group receive a matched number of sessions of standard gait training using body-weight supported treadmill training and overground training. Intervention: Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training
Group 3: Passive controls
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this group continue with normal daily activities over 12 weeks.
Interventions
Walking Improvement for Spinal Cord Injuries with Exoskeleton
Standard gait training using BWS PT and overground training
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Motor incomplete paraplegia or tetraplegia
- Neurological level of injury (NLI) C1- approximately T10 (inclusive, for upper motor neuron injuries only), as determined by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
- Sufficient diaphragmatic strength such that respiration is not compromised with exercise.
- Sufficient upper extremity strength to use a front wheeled walker either by manual muscle testing (minimum triceps strength bilaterally of 3/5, shoulder abduction/adduction and flexion/extension 4/5)
- AIS-C SCI \& AIS-D SCI, as determined by the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI)
- Ambulates at \<0.44 meters/second with or without physical assistance and assistance device
- WISCI ≥ 1
- yrs, inclusive
- No current or history of other neurological conditions
- Screened and cleared by a physician
- Involved in standing program or must be able to tolerate at least 15 min upright
- Weigh 220 pounds (100kg) or less
- Be able to fit into the Ekso device
- Approximately between 5'0" and 6'4" tall
- Standing hip width of approximately 18" or less
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- AIS-A SCI or AIS-B SCI
- Lower motor neuron injuries, as shown by absent reflexes during bilateral quadriceps and Achilles tendon taps
- \< 3 months since previous intensive gait training regimen
- Already walking at self-selected ambulation speeds of at least 0.44 meter/second with or without assistance
- Currently involved in another intervention study
- Concurrent neurological disease
- Hip flexion contracture greater than \~17°
- Knee flexion contracture greater than 12°
- Unable to achieve neutral ankle dorsiflexion with passive stretch (neutral with max 12° knee flexion)
- Leg length discrepancy
- Greater than 0.5" for upper leg
- Greater than 0.75" for lower leg
- Spinal instability
- Unresolved deep vein thrombosis
- Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ekso Bionicslead
- Burke Medical Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Barrow Neurological Institute at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013, United States
Gaylord Hospital
Wallingford, Connecticut, 06492, United States
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Marianjoy Rehabilitation Hospital
Wheaton, Illinois, 60187, United States
Kennedy Kruger Institute
Baltimore, Maryland, 21211, United States
Rehabilitation Institute of Michigan
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Courage Kenny Research Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407, United States
Kessler Foundation
West Orange, New Jersey, 07052, United States
Burke Medical Research Institute
White Plains, New York, 10605, United States
TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Publications (7)
Stampacchia G, Rustici A, Bigazzi S, Gerini A, Tombini T, Mazzoleni S. Walking with a powered robotic exoskeleton: Subjective experience, spasticity and pain in spinal cord injured persons. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jun 27;39(2):277-83. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161358.
PMID: 27372363BACKGROUNDGad PN, Gerasimenko YP, Zdunowski S, Sayenko D, Haakana P, Turner A, Lu D, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Iron 'ElectriRx' man: Overground stepping in an exoskeleton combined with noninvasive spinal cord stimulation after paralysis. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015 Aug;2015:1124-7. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7318563.
PMID: 26736463BACKGROUNDKozlowski AJ, Bryce TN, Dijkers MP. Time and Effort Required by Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Learn to Use a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Spring;21(2):110-21. doi: 10.1310/sci2102-110. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
PMID: 26364280BACKGROUNDKressler J, Thomas CK, Field-Fote EC, Sanchez J, Widerstrom-Noga E, Cilien DC, Gant K, Ginnety K, Gonzalez H, Martinez A, Anderson KD, Nash MS. Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Oct;95(10):1878-1887.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.04.026. Epub 2014 May 17.
PMID: 24845221BACKGROUNDSale P, Russo EF, Russo M, Masiero S, Piccione F, Calabro RS, Filoni S. Effects on mobility training and de-adaptations in subjects with Spinal Cord Injury due to a Wearable Robot: a preliminary report. BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 28;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0536-0.
PMID: 26818847BACKGROUNDKolakowsky-Hayner SA, Crew J, Moran S, Shah A. Safety and feasibility of using the EksoTM bionic exoskeleton to aid ambulation after spinal cord injury. Spine. 2013 doi.org/10.4172/2165-7939.S4-003
BACKGROUNDForrest GF, Hutchinson K, Lorenz DJ, Buehner JJ, Vanhiel LR, Sisto SA, Basso DM. Are the 10 meter and 6 minute walk tests redundant in patients with spinal cord injury? PLoS One. 2014 May 1;9(5):e94108. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094108. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24788068BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dylan Edwards
- Organization
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dylan Edwards, PhD
Burke Medical Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2016
First Posted
October 25, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 10, 2019
Study Completion
September 10, 2019
Last Updated
October 31, 2023
Results First Posted
October 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share