Vaginal Packing After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
1 other identifier
interventional
253
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Vaginal packing is used routinely following vaginal reconstructive surgery, however, no recommendation regarding vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy exists. Despite little data to support the practice, purported benefits better positioning and fixation of the mesh, improving incorporation of the mesh by its fixation and reduced blood loss. Patients often complain of discomfort associated with the packing or its removal. The aim of this randomized controlled is to compare the subjective impressions of pain and bother in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy treated with and without packing. The investigators also aim to assess differences in postoperative bacteriuria, urine retention and hemoglobin levels on day 5 after the surgery and surgery outcome and complications at one year after the surgery in those with and without packing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 2, 2023
CompletedMarch 19, 2026
March 1, 2026
5.5 years
October 21, 2016
March 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Postoperative pain assessed using VAS
Visual analog scale (VAS)
The first post-operative day before extraction of the packing
Satisfaction with the overall postoperative course assessed using VAS
VAS
Postoperative day 5
Prolapse recurrence
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) classification - the most descending compartment \>-1cm from hymen
1 year after the surgery
Surgery related complications
According to the International Continence Society / International UroGynecology Association Joint Terminology and Classification Report of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) \& grafts in female pelvic floor surgery
From the surgery until 1 year after the surgery
Postoperative pain assessed using the McGill Questionnaire
McGill Questionnaire
The first post-operative day before extraction of the packing
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of analgesics used
From the end of the surgery until the first postoperative day
Positive urine culture
Postoperative day 5
Satisfaction with surgery assessed using VAS
Postoperative day 1 before packing extraction
Study Arms (2)
packing
EXPERIMENTALPatients after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a vaginal packing at the end of surgery
no packing
NO INTERVENTIONPatients after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without a vaginal packing at the end of surgery
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without a suburethral sling
- Pelvic organ prolapse stage \> 2
- Speak and read Czech
- Can to understand the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Any other surgery than sacrocolpopexy
- Concurrent hysterectomy or opening of the vagina during the surgery.
- Vaginal, uterine, cervical or ovarian malignancy
- Clotting disorder, taking anticoagulation
- Having intraoperative blood loss greater than 500 ml
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University Hospital
Pilsen, 30460, Czechia
Related Publications (4)
Thiagamoorthy G, Khalil A, Cardozo L, Srikrishna S, Leslie G, Robinson D. The value of vaginal packing in pelvic floor surgery: a randomised double-blind study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 May;25(5):585-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2264-y. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
PMID: 24310987BACKGROUNDWestermann LB, Crisp CC, Oakley SH, Mazloomdoost D, Kleeman SD, Benbouajili JM, Ghodsi V, Pauls RN. To Pack or Not to Pack? A Randomized Trial of Vaginal Packing After Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):111-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000238.
PMID: 26825408BACKGROUNDRusavy Z, Marinic Veverkova A, Smazinka M, Kalis V. Vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - postoperative pain and satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2026 Jan;316:114815. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114815. Epub 2025 Nov 5.
PMID: 41202691DERIVEDRusavy Z, Marinic Veverkova A, Smazinka M, Kalis V. Vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and surgical outcome after one year: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Dec;104(12):2331-2338. doi: 10.1111/aogs.70067. Epub 2025 Oct 10.
PMID: 41070594DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zdenek Rusavy, MD PhD
Medical Faculty in Pilsen, Charles University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2016
First Posted
October 24, 2016
Study Start
November 14, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
July 2, 2023
Last Updated
March 19, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share