NCT02943525

Brief Summary

Vaginal packing is used routinely following vaginal reconstructive surgery, however, no recommendation regarding vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy exists. Despite little data to support the practice, purported benefits better positioning and fixation of the mesh, improving incorporation of the mesh by its fixation and reduced blood loss. Patients often complain of discomfort associated with the packing or its removal. The aim of this randomized controlled is to compare the subjective impressions of pain and bother in women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy treated with and without packing. The investigators also aim to assess differences in postoperative bacteriuria, urine retention and hemoglobin levels on day 5 after the surgery and surgery outcome and complications at one year after the surgery in those with and without packing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
253

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 21, 2016

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 24, 2016

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 14, 2016

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2022

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 2, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 19, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5.5 years

First QC Date

October 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

vaginal packingpelvic organ prolapsepain and satisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Postoperative pain assessed using VAS

    Visual analog scale (VAS)

    The first post-operative day before extraction of the packing

  • Satisfaction with the overall postoperative course assessed using VAS

    VAS

    Postoperative day 5

  • Prolapse recurrence

    Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) classification - the most descending compartment \>-1cm from hymen

    1 year after the surgery

  • Surgery related complications

    According to the International Continence Society / International UroGynecology Association Joint Terminology and Classification Report of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) \& grafts in female pelvic floor surgery

    From the surgery until 1 year after the surgery

  • Postoperative pain assessed using the McGill Questionnaire

    McGill Questionnaire

    The first post-operative day before extraction of the packing

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of analgesics used

    From the end of the surgery until the first postoperative day

  • Positive urine culture

    Postoperative day 5

  • Satisfaction with surgery assessed using VAS

    Postoperative day 1 before packing extraction

Study Arms (2)

packing

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a vaginal packing at the end of surgery

Procedure: vaginal packing

no packing

NO INTERVENTION

Patients after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without a vaginal packing at the end of surgery

Interventions

Packing vagina with a Boric acid soaked gauze at the end of surgery

packing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without a suburethral sling
  • Pelvic organ prolapse stage \> 2
  • Speak and read Czech
  • Can to understand the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Any other surgery than sacrocolpopexy
  • Concurrent hysterectomy or opening of the vagina during the surgery.
  • Vaginal, uterine, cervical or ovarian malignancy
  • Clotting disorder, taking anticoagulation
  • Having intraoperative blood loss greater than 500 ml

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University Hospital

Pilsen, 30460, Czechia

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Thiagamoorthy G, Khalil A, Cardozo L, Srikrishna S, Leslie G, Robinson D. The value of vaginal packing in pelvic floor surgery: a randomised double-blind study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 May;25(5):585-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2264-y. Epub 2013 Dec 6.

    PMID: 24310987BACKGROUND
  • Westermann LB, Crisp CC, Oakley SH, Mazloomdoost D, Kleeman SD, Benbouajili JM, Ghodsi V, Pauls RN. To Pack or Not to Pack? A Randomized Trial of Vaginal Packing After Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):111-7. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000238.

    PMID: 26825408BACKGROUND
  • Rusavy Z, Marinic Veverkova A, Smazinka M, Kalis V. Vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy - postoperative pain and satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2026 Jan;316:114815. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114815. Epub 2025 Nov 5.

  • Rusavy Z, Marinic Veverkova A, Smazinka M, Kalis V. Vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and surgical outcome after one year: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Dec;104(12):2331-2338. doi: 10.1111/aogs.70067. Epub 2025 Oct 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ ProlapsePainPersonal Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ProlapsePathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Zdenek Rusavy, MD PhD

    Medical Faculty in Pilsen, Charles University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D., Ph.D.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2016

First Posted

October 24, 2016

Study Start

November 14, 2016

Primary Completion

June 1, 2022

Study Completion

July 2, 2023

Last Updated

March 19, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations