Diet-Induced Thermogenesis: A Comparison of Whole and Processed Foods
1 other identifier
interventional
12
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study will examine differences in diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT) between a meal made of processed ingredients and an equivalent, isocaloric meal made of whole ingredients. For the purpose of this study processed foods (PFs) will be considered those that are purchased in a state that is modified from their whole food (WF) counterpart (e.g. shell eggs compared to powdered eggs). Research has shown that less energy is expended to digest processed foods than whole foods, which confers an advantage to processed foods in terms of caloric efficiency, but a disadvantage in terms of energy balance and weight loss. A 2010 study showed that subjects expended approximately 10% less energy to digest sandwiches made of white bread and cheese product compared to sandwiches made of whole grain bread and cheddar cheese. The intent of this study is to enhance those results and improve upon the study design by constructing meals to be more similar in the makeup of individual ingredients, making ingredient processing a more isolated variable. Subjects will be healthy CWU male students with a body mass index of 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2. Metabolism will be assessed by repeated measurements of resting energy expenditure via indirect calorimetry. Measurements of baseline metabolism will be made; subjects will then be provided one of two meals, both comprised of rice, green beans, and eggs cooked in canola oil and equivalent but differing in processing status (e.g. brown rice and white rice, fresh cooked green beans and canned green beans, etc). Hourly metabolic measurements will be made post-meal for 6 hours. During this time subjects will be asked to minimize non-DIT deviations in metabolism; e.g. those due to physical activity, excitement level, etc. The procedure will be repeated one week later with the other meal so that changes in DIT can be assessed on a subject-by-subject basis. The results of this study will be assessed in the lens of weight loss, specifically dietary choices that affect energy balance. It is possible that consuming a diet that includes more whole foods (versus processed foods) would be beneficial to the attainment of a healthy body weight - either through potential weight loss or weight maintenance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1 obesity
Started Jun 2016
Shorter than P25 for phase_1 obesity
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 24, 2016
CompletedOctober 24, 2016
October 1, 2016
1 month
October 20, 2016
October 21, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in resting energy expenditure will be assessed via indirect calorimetry
Resting energy expenditure will be assessed at baseline and post-baseline at hours 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 for a total of 7 measurements
Study Arms (2)
Processed Food
OTHERChanges in resting energy expenditure will be measured via indirect calorimetry after consumption of a processed foods meal to determine changes in diet-induced thermogenesis.
Whole Food
OTHERChanges in resting energy expenditure will be measured via indirect calorimetry after consumption of a whole foods meal to determine changes in diet-induced thermogenesis.
Interventions
This is examining the effects of processed foods on diet-induced thermogenesis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males
- Ages 18 - 25 years
- BMI: 18.5 - 29.9 kg/m2
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosed with cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, thyroid disorder, metabolic disorders, eating disorders, and/or egg allergy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nicole R Stendell-Hollis, PhD
Central Washington University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2016
First Posted
October 24, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share