NCT02934126

Brief Summary

Background: The Dutch guideline on breast cancer treatment shows several grey areas, where no clear recommendation is given on the radiotherapy options, but where the advice is to discuss the treatment of choice with the patient. Currently, patients are exposed to different information given by the professionals' personal styles of informing patients. The challenge for all oncological professionals is to give clear, structured, and neutral information on the pros and cons of the treatment option(s) in the context of the natural course of the disease to the patient; to elicit patients' needs and preferences. How and which information should be shared in a decision aid is up for investigation, as well as how this should best be implemented. Research goals: Qualitative assessment of patients' and health care professionals' informational needs and perspectives on breast cancer radiotherapy and shard decision making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews will be held with both breast cancer patients and health care professionals. To reach as heterogeneous groups as possible patients of different ages, with different education levels and who underwent different treatments or chose not to get radiotherapy at all will be selected . Data will be collected til saturation is reached. Interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Results of the qualitative study are expected at the beginning of 2017. Hypothesis: Investigating the patients' and health care professionals' perspectives on shared decision making and informational needs on radiotherapeutic options will help the development of a personalized decision aid eligible for broad implementation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2016

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2016

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 27, 2016

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 14, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 28, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 28, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 27, 2016

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patients' perspectives on informational needs and shared decision making when making a decision on radiation treatment, a qualitative assessment.

    the face-to face interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The analysis will be performed by two independent researches with help of NVIVO 11

    4 months

  • Health care professionals perspectives' on shared decision making and decision tools when facing a preference-sensitive decision on radiation treatment, a qualitative assesment

    the face-to face interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The analysis will be performed by two independent researches with help of NVIVO 11

    4 months

Study Arms (1)

breast cancer patients

breast cancer patients who have faced a decision on different types of radiotherapy or to leave radiotherapy out of the treatment

Other: breast cancer patients

Interventions

semi structured face to face interviews

breast cancer patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

breast cancer patients, who during their treatment faced a decision between different radiation treatments or not to have radiotherapy at all

You may qualify if:

  • months after facing decision or \> 1 year after decision
  • able to speak and understand Dutch
  • Written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • recurrence of breast cancer prior to interview

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Netherlands Cancer Institute

Amsterdam, 1066CX, Netherlands

Location

Maastro Clinic

Maastricht, 6229 ET, Netherlands

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nicola Russell, MD, PhD

    The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Liesbeth Boersma, MD, PhD

    Maastricht unversity medical center- MAASTRO clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Trudy van der Weijden, MD, PhD

    Maastricht University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2016

First Posted

October 14, 2016

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion

December 28, 2016

Study Completion

December 28, 2016

Last Updated

September 27, 2017

Record last verified: 2016-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations