The Development of a Personalized Decision Aid: Perspectives of Patients and Health Care Professionals on Shared Decision Making and Informational Needs on Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer
M16SDM
1 other identifier
observational
15
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: The Dutch guideline on breast cancer treatment shows several grey areas, where no clear recommendation is given on the radiotherapy options, but where the advice is to discuss the treatment of choice with the patient. Currently, patients are exposed to different information given by the professionals' personal styles of informing patients. The challenge for all oncological professionals is to give clear, structured, and neutral information on the pros and cons of the treatment option(s) in the context of the natural course of the disease to the patient; to elicit patients' needs and preferences. How and which information should be shared in a decision aid is up for investigation, as well as how this should best be implemented. Research goals: Qualitative assessment of patients' and health care professionals' informational needs and perspectives on breast cancer radiotherapy and shard decision making. Methods: Semi-structured interviews will be held with both breast cancer patients and health care professionals. To reach as heterogeneous groups as possible patients of different ages, with different education levels and who underwent different treatments or chose not to get radiotherapy at all will be selected . Data will be collected til saturation is reached. Interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Results of the qualitative study are expected at the beginning of 2017. Hypothesis: Investigating the patients' and health care professionals' perspectives on shared decision making and informational needs on radiotherapeutic options will help the development of a personalized decision aid eligible for broad implementation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 28, 2016
CompletedSeptember 27, 2017
September 1, 2016
4 months
September 27, 2016
September 26, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patients' perspectives on informational needs and shared decision making when making a decision on radiation treatment, a qualitative assessment.
the face-to face interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The analysis will be performed by two independent researches with help of NVIVO 11
4 months
Health care professionals perspectives' on shared decision making and decision tools when facing a preference-sensitive decision on radiation treatment, a qualitative assesment
the face-to face interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The analysis will be performed by two independent researches with help of NVIVO 11
4 months
Study Arms (1)
breast cancer patients
breast cancer patients who have faced a decision on different types of radiotherapy or to leave radiotherapy out of the treatment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
breast cancer patients, who during their treatment faced a decision between different radiation treatments or not to have radiotherapy at all
You may qualify if:
- months after facing decision or \> 1 year after decision
- able to speak and understand Dutch
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- recurrence of breast cancer prior to interview
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, 1066CX, Netherlands
Maastro Clinic
Maastricht, 6229 ET, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nicola Russell, MD, PhD
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Liesbeth Boersma, MD, PhD
Maastricht unversity medical center- MAASTRO clinic
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Trudy van der Weijden, MD, PhD
Maastricht University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2016
First Posted
October 14, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 28, 2016
Study Completion
December 28, 2016
Last Updated
September 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2016-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share