Interval Training in Cardiac Rehabilitation
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether high intensity interval training (INT) is more effective in suppressing platelet reactivity than continuous, moderate intensity training (CONT) in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 14, 2017
CompletedAugust 31, 2017
August 1, 2017
1.7 years
October 7, 2016
August 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Platelet reactivity at physical rest: EC50 of TRAP-6 in terms of platelet CD62P expression. Unit of Measure: µM (Micromolar)
Platelet reactivity as measured by half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of the platelet agonist TRAP-6 (Thrombin receptor activating peptide-6; SFLLRN) in terms of platelet CD62P (P-selectin) expression, as described in Heber et al. 2016 (PMID: 26909532). The percentage of CD62P expressing platelets is quantified by flow cytometry without and with increasing concentrations of the platelet agonist TRAP-6. EC50 of TRAP-6 is estimated by fitting a four parameter logistic dose-response curve to flow cytometry data as a function of agonist concentration, aggregating multiple measurements to one reported value (EC50) with the unit µM. Treatment effects on platelet reactivity at physical rest after 6 weeks (INT vs. CONT) are estimated by ANCOVA, with baseline values as covariate.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Platelet reactivity at physical rest: EC50 of TRAP-6 in terms of platelet CD62P expression. Unit of Measure: µM
12 weeks
Cardiorespiratory fitness: Maximal power output
6 weeks
Cardiorespiratory fitness: Maximal power output
12 weeks
Cardiorespiratory fitness: Maximal oxygen consumption
6 weeks
Cardiorespiratory fitness: Maximal oxygen consumption
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Interval
EXPERIMENTAL2x / week INT 2x / week CONT
Continuous
ACTIVE COMPARATOR4x / week CONT
Interventions
* 5 min warm-up (40% Pmax\*) * 30 min high intensity interval training (1 min 100% Pmax, 1 min 20% Pmax, in alternating sequence) * 10 min cool-down (30% Pmax) Pmax\*: Maximal power output (Watt) achieved at the end of an incremental exercise test.
* 5 min warm-up (40% Pmax\*) * 30 min moderate intensity continuous training (60% Pmax) * 10 min cool-down (30% Pmax) Pmax\*: Maximal power output (Watt) achieved at the end of an incremental exercise test.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- No regular exercise training within the last 6 months
- Dual anti-platelet therapy (low-dose aspirin plus ADP(adenosine diphosphate)-receptor antagonist)
- Status post percutaneous coronary intervention after recent acute coronary syndrome as underlying reason for current rehabilitation
- Eligibility for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation according to Table I in Niebauer et al. 2013 (PMID: 22508693)
You may not qualify if:
- Type II diabetes mellitus
- Aortic aneurysm / dissection
- Uncontrolled hypertension (\>180/110 mmHg)
- Pulmonary hypertension (\>55 mmHg)
- Previously known hereditary platelet disorders
- Disorders of plasmatic coagulation
- Anemia (Hb \< 13g/dl)
- History of end-stage liver or kidney disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Viennalead
- Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of Viennacollaborator
- Austrian Heart Fundscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
MUVienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Related Publications (3)
Niebauer J, Mayr K, Tschentscher M, Pokan R, Benzer W. Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the Austrian model. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Jun;20(3):468-79. doi: 10.1177/2047487312446137. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
PMID: 22508693BACKGROUNDHeber S, Assinger A, Pokan R, Volf I. Correlation between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Platelet Function in Healthy Women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1101-10. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000882.
PMID: 26909532BACKGROUNDHeber S, Fischer B, Sallaberger-Lehner M, Hausharter M, Ocenasek H, Gleiss A, Fischer MJM, Pokan R, Assinger A, Volf I. Effects of high-intensity interval training on platelet function in cardiac rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2020 Jan;106(1):69-79. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315130. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
PMID: 31315940DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefan Heber, MD
Medical University of Vienna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Med. Univ.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2016
First Posted
October 12, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 14, 2017
Study Completion
June 14, 2017
Last Updated
August 31, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08