Efficacy CompariSon of Pre-stenting Atherectomy Versus Scoring ballooN for calcifieD Coronary Lesions Coronary Lesions
ECSPAND
A Single Center, Randomized Trial of Treatment Strategies for Obstructive Calcified Coronary Lesions: Efficacy CompariSon of Pre-stenting Atherectomy Versus Scoring ballooN for calcifieD Coronary Lesions Coronary Lesions (ECSPAND)
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Design: The proposed study is a randomized study comparing the relative effectiveness of three lesion modification strategies (RA, SBS, or OAS) in the treatment of obstructive CCLs using the change in lumen size measurements (MLA, RLA, MSA and the ratio of MSA/MLA) obtained with IVUS or OCT. Patients will be blinded to treatment assignment for the duration of the study. Treatment: Patients who are randomized to RA will undergo coronary wiring of the CCL and subsequent advancement of the RA burr. The RA system is performed using standard technique under intravenous infusion of heparin. The atherectomy burr size will be determined by the operator. Patients who are randomized to OAS will undergo coronary wiring of the CCL and subsequent advancement of the OAS according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Control: Patients who are randomized to SBS will undergo coronary wiring and balloon inflation with SBS performed by standard technique under intravenous infusion of heparin. SBS will be used according to the AngioSculpt manufacturer's guidelines. Duration: 30 days follow-up. The primary trial objective is to determine which of the three treatment strategies for treating calcified coronary lesions (RA, SBS, or OA) is superior for obtaining higher ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen area/reference lumen area, as determined by IVUS or OCT (primary study endpoint). The secondary objectives are to compare the following:
- 1.Difference in pre- vs. post-treatment minimum lumen area (MLA, lumen area gain), as determined by IVUS or OCT (secondary endpoint)
- 2.Mean final minimal stent area (MSA), as assessed by IVUS or OCT (secondary endpoint)
- 3.Ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen diameter/reference lumen diameter, as determined by quantitative coronary angiography (secondary endpoint)
- 4.Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) during 30 days of follow-up (secondary endpoints)
- 5.Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume (secondary endpoints)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedApril 7, 2017
April 1, 2017
2 years
June 21, 2016
April 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen area/reference lumen area
IVUS measurement based determination of ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen area/reference lumen area, as determined by IVUS
Immediately after stenting
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Difference in pre- vs. post-treatment minimum lumen area (MLA, lumen area gain)
Immediately after stenting
Mean final minimal stent area (MSA)
Immediately after stenting
Ratio of final in-stent minimum lumen diameter/reference lumen diameter
Immediately after stenting
Lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) during 30 days of follow-up
30 days
Procedure time
Immediately after the end of the interventional procedure
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Rotational atherectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORRA protocol: After IVUS protocol, patients who are randomized to RA will undergo coronary wiring of the target lesion and subsequent advancement of the RA burr. The RA system is performed using standard technique under intravenous infusion of heparin. The atherectomy burr size will be determined by the operator.
Orbital atherectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATOROAS protocol: After IVUS protocol, patients who are randomized to OAS will undergo coronary wiring of the target lesion and subsequent advancement of the OAS according to the manufacturer's guidelines.
Scoring balloon system
ACTIVE COMPARATORSBS protocol: After IVUS protocol, patients who are randomized to SBS will undergo coronary wiring of the target lesion and balloon inflation with SBS performed by standard technique under intravenous infusion of heparin. SBS will be used according to the manufacturer's guidelines.
Interventions
Pre-stenting lesion modification using the rotational atherectomy device using standard technique under intravenous infusion of heparin. Burr size will be selected by the operator according to vessel size. IVUS images will be obtained before lesion modification and after stenting.
Pre-stenting lesion modification using the orbital atherectomy device according the manufacturer's guidelines. IVUS images will be obtained before lesion modification and after stenting.
Pre-stenting lesion modification using the scoring balloon system according the manufacturer's guidelines. IVUS images will be obtained before lesion modification and after stenting.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Clinical indication for coronary intervention such as ischemic symptoms and/or a positive functional study
- Found to have a de novo severe calcification (radio opacities noted without cardiac motion on contrast injection, lesion length \>15 mm, or presence of \>270° calcification on one cross-sectional view of IVUS) in a native coronary artery on fluoroscopy or IVUS
You may not qualify if:
- Subject is currently participating in an investigational device or pharmaceutical treatment protocol
- Persistent (\>10 minutes) hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg)
- Need for revascularization of multiple lesions during the index PCI
- Unprotected left main (\>50%) or equivalent left main disease
- Non-calcified lesions
- Chronic total occlusions, extreme lesion tortuosity including Type B/C lesions
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction \<25%)
- History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Genereux P, Lee AC, Kim CY, Lee M, Shlofmitz R, Moses JW, Stone GW, Chambers JW. Orbital Atherectomy for Treating De Novo Severely Calcified Coronary Narrowing (1-Year Results from the Pivotal ORBIT II Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jun 15;115(12):1685-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PMID: 25910525BACKGROUNDVaquerizo B, Serra A, Miranda F, Triano JL, Sierra G, Delgado G, Puentes A, Mojal S, Brugera J. Aggressive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and/or cutting balloon before drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions. J Interv Cardiol. 2010 Jun;23(3):240-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00547.x.
PMID: 20636844BACKGROUNDAdamian M, Colombo A, Briguori C, Nishida T, Marsico F, Di Mario C, Albiero R, Moussa I, Moses JW. Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a matched comparison with rotational atherectomy, additional stent implantation and balloon angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Sep;38(3):672-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01458-9.
PMID: 11527615BACKGROUNDGenereux P, Madhavan MV, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Palmerini T, Lasalle L, Xu K, McAndrew T, Kirtane A, Lansky AJ, Brener SJ, Mehran R, Stone GW. Ischemic outcomes after coronary intervention of calcified vessels in acute coronary syndromes. Pooled analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) TRIALS. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 13;63(18):1845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
PMID: 24561145BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Emmanouil S Brilakis, MD, PhD
North Texas Veterans Healthcare System
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jerrold Grodin, MD
North Texas Veterans Healthcare System
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2016
First Posted
June 30, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 7, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share