Mobilisation Algorithm After Incidental Durotomy
Flat Bed Rest vs. Immediate Mobilisation After Incidental Durotomy During Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Prospective Randomised Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients with persistent symptoms of cerebrospinal-fluid leakage (positional headache, photophobia, nausea and vomiting, clear drainage from the wound, fluctuant subcutaneous wound) after a primary repair should be considered for revision surgery to avoid potentially serious complications including CSF (cerebro spinal fluid) fistula formation. Prolonged bed rest immediatel after reapir of an ID () incidental durotomy) is widely accepted and frequently applied. current literature provides supporting retrospective evidence that prolonged bed rest may not be required after watertight closure of dural tears. The purpose of this study is to further investigate the impact of prolonged bed rest on the need for early reoperation following primary repair of an ID after lumbar spinal surgery. The primary endpoint of this study is the difference in reoperation rate between the two study groups to further investigate if either one or the other postoperative mobilisation regimen provides a significant benefit in terms of persistent dural leakage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 7, 2016
June 1, 2016
1.5 years
October 6, 2016
October 6, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reoperation rate
The primary endpoint of this study is the difference in reoperation rate between the two study groups to further investigate if either one or the other postoperative mobilisation regimen provides a significant benefit in terms of persistent dural leakage.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Bed Rest
ACTIVE COMPARATOR48 hours of strict bed rest after incidental durotomy during lumbar spinal surgery
Early Mobilization
EXPERIMENTALImmediate Mobilization after incidental durotomy during lumbar spinal surgery
Interventions
early postoperative mobilisation (walking and sitting). Initial postoperative mobilisation is going to be under supervision of a qualified physiotherapist. The presence of a qualified physiotherapist at first mobilisation is solely for reasons of safety. No specific exercise or regimen is planned.
48 hours of strict bed rest followed by postoperative mobilisation under supervision of a qualified physiotherapist. During the bed rest period elevation of the head is tolerated to a maximum of 30°.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients over the age of 18 years with an ID sustained during a primary or revision lumbar spinal procedure at our institution are the subject of this prospective, randomised analysis.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients referred for repair of an externally sustained ID, cases in which durotomy was not primarily recognised and repaired as well as patient who refuse to sign informed consent are going to be excluded from this analysis. Informed consent is going to be obtained one day prior to index procedure.
- Further Intervention because of Spondylitis/Spondylodiscitis, Tumor, Trauma. Pregnant patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Balgrist
Zurich, 8008, Switzerland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mazda Farshad, MD MPH
University Hospital Balgrist Zurich
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD MPH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2016
First Posted
October 7, 2016
Study Start
October 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 7, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share